Risk-adjusted benchmarks in laparoscopic liver surgery in a national cohort

Felice Giuliante, Francesco Ardito, Roberto Lombardi, Guido Torzilli, Giuseppe Zimmitti, N. Russolillo, L. Aldrighetti, U. Cillo, A. Guglielmi, G. M. Ettorre, V. Mazzaferro, Valle R. Dalla, Carlis L. De, E. Jovine, A. Ferrero, F. Ratti, Tesoriere R. Lo, E. Gringeri, A. Ruzzenente, Sandri G. B. LeviM. Virdis, M. Iaria, F. Ferla, Benedetto F. Di, S. Gruttadauria, U. Boggi, E. Rossi, L. Vincenti, S. Berti, G. Ceccarelli, G. Belli, F. Zamboni, F. Calise, A. Coratti, R. Santambrogio, A. Brolese, G. Navarra, P. Mezzatesta, M. Ravaioli

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

9 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the best achievable outcomes in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) after risk adjustment based on surgical technical difficulty using a national registry. Methods: LLRs registered in the Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery registry from November 2014 to March 2018 were considered. Benchmarks were calculated according to the Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC™). LLRs at each centre were divided into three clusters (groups I, II and III) based on the Kawaguchi classification. ABCs for overall and major morbidity were calculated in each cluster. Multivariable analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for overall and major morbidity. Significant variables were used in further risk adjustment. Results: A total of 1752 of 2263 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 1096 (62·6 per cent) in group I, 435 (24·8 per cent) in group II and 221 (12·6 per cent) in group III. The ABCs for overall morbidity (7·8, 14·2 and 26·4 per cent for grades I, II and II respectively) and major morbidity (1·4, 2·2 and 5·7 per cent) increased with the difficulty of LLR. Multivariable analysis showed an increased risk of overall morbidity associated with multiple LLRs (odds ratio (OR) 1·35), simultaneous intestinal resection (OR 3·76) and cirrhosis (OR 1·83), and an increased risk of major morbidity with intestinal resection (OR 4·61). ABCs for overall and major morbidity were 14·4 and 3·2 per cent respectively for multiple LLRs, 30 and 11·1 per cent for intestinal resection, and 14·9 and 4·8 per cent for cirrhosis. Conclusion: Overall morbidity benchmarks for LLR ranged from 7·8 to 26·4 per cent, and those for major morbidity from 1·4 to 5·7 per cent, depending on complexity. Benchmark values should be adjusted according to multiple LLRs or simultaneous intestinal resection and cirrhosis.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)845-853
Numero di pagine9
RivistaBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume107
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2020

Keywords

  • benchmarks
  • major morbidity
  • Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery
  • laparoscopic liver surgery

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Risk-adjusted benchmarks in laparoscopic liver surgery in a national cohort'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo