TY - JOUR
T1 - Reward sensitivity, decisional bias, and metacognitive deficits in cocaine drug addiction
AU - Balconi, Michela
AU - Finocchiaro, Roberta
AU - Campanella, Salvatore
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Objectives: The present research explored the effect of reward sensitivity bias and metacognitive deficits on substance use disorder (SUD) in the decision-making process.
Methods: The behavioral activation system (BAS) was used as a predictive marker of dysfunctional behavior during the Iowa gambling task (IGT). We also tried to relate this motivational system bias to self-reported metacognitive measures (self-knowledge, strategic planning, flexibility, and efficacy) in the decision processes. Thirty-four SUD participants (cocaine dependent) and 39 participants in the control group underwent the IGT.
Results: The SUD group was associated with a poorer performance on the IGT and a dysfunctional metacognition ability (unrealistic representation). An increase in the reward sensitivity (higher BAS, BAS reward responsiveness, and BAS reward) was observed in the SUD group compared with the control group and explained (through a regression analysis) the main behavioral deficits. More generally, an increase in the BAS reward responsiveness may be considered a predictive measure of risk-taking and dysfunctional behavior, not only in pathological (SUD) individuals, but also in subclinical individuals (controls).
Conclusions: We discuss the likely cognitive, brain, and neurotransmitter contributions to this phenomenon.
AB - Objectives: The present research explored the effect of reward sensitivity bias and metacognitive deficits on substance use disorder (SUD) in the decision-making process.
Methods: The behavioral activation system (BAS) was used as a predictive marker of dysfunctional behavior during the Iowa gambling task (IGT). We also tried to relate this motivational system bias to self-reported metacognitive measures (self-knowledge, strategic planning, flexibility, and efficacy) in the decision processes. Thirty-four SUD participants (cocaine dependent) and 39 participants in the control group underwent the IGT.
Results: The SUD group was associated with a poorer performance on the IGT and a dysfunctional metacognition ability (unrealistic representation). An increase in the reward sensitivity (higher BAS, BAS reward responsiveness, and BAS reward) was observed in the SUD group compared with the control group and explained (through a regression analysis) the main behavioral deficits. More generally, an increase in the BAS reward responsiveness may be considered a predictive measure of risk-taking and dysfunctional behavior, not only in pathological (SUD) individuals, but also in subclinical individuals (controls).
Conclusions: We discuss the likely cognitive, brain, and neurotransmitter contributions to this phenomenon.
KW - Addiction
KW - Decision-making
KW - Metacognitive deficit
KW - Reward mechanism
KW - Addiction
KW - Decision-making
KW - Metacognitive deficit
KW - Reward mechanism
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/64351
U2 - 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000065
DO - 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000065
M3 - Article
SN - 1932-0620
VL - 8
SP - 399
EP - 406
JO - Journal of Addiction Medicine
JF - Journal of Addiction Medicine
ER -