TY - JOUR
T1 - Restitution and return of cultural property between negotiation and restorative justice: time to bridge the river
AU - Visconti, Arianna
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - There is a need for dialogue between two perspectives – the negotiated settlement of legal disputes and the use of restorative justice programmes in post-conflict situations – with respect to the recovery of cultural objects displaced in times of war and/or colonial occupation. Although the application of such perspectives led to the recovery of disputed cultural objects, this has mostly been achieved unwittingly. However, the resolution of restitution claims would benefit from a conscious exchange between experts and practitioners of the two approaches. We will summarise cultural property displacement in its practical complexities, briefly discussing problems related to both ‘historical’ depredations and the current trafficking in cultural objects, with a focus on the current trend towards increased use of criminal law. A tool, however, mostly ineffective in providing a solution for the most heartfelt questions arising from breaking an object’s links to its cultural roots. After carrying out an overview of international conventions currently addressing these issues, discussing why these legal instruments oft cannot actually heal the wounds caused by depredations of cultural property, we will illustrate the need for an approach more focused on the ‘human’ meaning of questions of restitution of objects that are so much more than ‘things’.
AB - There is a need for dialogue between two perspectives – the negotiated settlement of legal disputes and the use of restorative justice programmes in post-conflict situations – with respect to the recovery of cultural objects displaced in times of war and/or colonial occupation. Although the application of such perspectives led to the recovery of disputed cultural objects, this has mostly been achieved unwittingly. However, the resolution of restitution claims would benefit from a conscious exchange between experts and practitioners of the two approaches. We will summarise cultural property displacement in its practical complexities, briefly discussing problems related to both ‘historical’ depredations and the current trafficking in cultural objects, with a focus on the current trend towards increased use of criminal law. A tool, however, mostly ineffective in providing a solution for the most heartfelt questions arising from breaking an object’s links to its cultural roots. After carrying out an overview of international conventions currently addressing these issues, discussing why these legal instruments oft cannot actually heal the wounds caused by depredations of cultural property, we will illustrate the need for an approach more focused on the ‘human’ meaning of questions of restitution of objects that are so much more than ‘things’.
KW - Cultural heritage law
KW - alternative dispute resolution
KW - looted cultural objects
KW - restorative justice
KW - return restitution and repatriation
KW - Cultural heritage law
KW - alternative dispute resolution
KW - looted cultural objects
KW - restorative justice
KW - return restitution and repatriation
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/216787
UR - https://www.elevenjournals.com/tijdschrift/tijrj/detail
U2 - 10.5553/TIJRJ.000128
DO - 10.5553/TIJRJ.000128
M3 - Article
SN - 2589-0905
VL - 2022
SP - 1
EP - 24
JO - THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE
JF - THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE
ER -