Responsabilità non umane al tramonto dell’antropocene? Riflessi penalistici

Rosa Maria Palavera*

*Autore corrispondente per questo lavoro

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista


The hypothesis of attribution of electronic personality or possibly graduated personhood to artificial intelligence is assessed with reference to its alleged necessity, to the selective efficacy of the invoked requirements and to the overall repercussions on the penal system. A risk is detected in term of negative impact on the level of protection of legal assets, the responsibility of the involved subjects and the systematic endurance of legal theory grounds. Furthermore, the purely normative technique required by the creation of digital legal personhood seems largely subdued to a coercive model of justice, open to the vicarious and vindicatory drifts of symbolic and authoritarian criminal law. Hope is expressed that responsibilities, even if widely shared, will be brought back to humans, seriously rethinking models of prevention and response to crimes.
Titolo tradotto del contributo[Autom. eng. transl.] Non-human responsibilities at the end of the anthropocene? Criminal reflexes
Lingua originaleItalian
pagine (da-a)184-214
Numero di pagine31
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2020


  • electronic personality
  • enemy criminal law
  • normative mens rea
  • symbolic criminal law
  • theory of justice
  • theory of punishment


Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Responsabilità non umane al tramonto dell’antropocene? Riflessi penalistici'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo