Abstract
The main aim of this study was to examine the absolute and relative reliability of some
commonly used strength imbalance indices such as concentric hamstring-toconcentric
quadriceps ratio, eccentric hamstring-to-concentric quadriceps ratio and
bilateral concentric and eccentric strength ratios. An additional aim was to examine the
reliability of the peak torque and work of the knee extensor and flexor muscles
measured using the Cybex NORM dynamometer. Eighteen physically active healthy
subjects (mean ± standard deviation, age 23 ± 3 years, height 176 ± 5 cm, body
mass 74 ± 8 kg) were tested three times with 96 h between sessions. Peak torque,
average work, unilateral and bilateral ratios were determined at 60, 120, 180 and )60
s)1. Low (0Æ34) to moderate (0Æ87) relative reliability (intraclass correlation
coefficient, ICC) was found for strength imbalance ratios with eccentric hamstringto-
concentric quadriceps ratio showing the greater ICC (>0Æ80). High ICC values
(0Æ90 0Æ98) were found for peak torque and average work. Absolute reliability
(standard error of measurement) ranged from 3Æ2% to 8Æ7% for strength imbalance
ratios and from 4Æ3% to 7Æ7% for peak torque and average work measurements. This
study established the reliability of the most common strength imbalance ratios and of
absolute isokinetic muscle strength assessed using the Cybex NORM
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
pagine (da-a) | 113-119 |
Numero di pagine | 7 |
Rivista | Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging |
Volume | (2008) 28 |
DOI | |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2008 |
Keywords
- asymmetry
- hamstring
- quadriceps
- reproducibility
- torque