TY - JOUR
T1 - Relationship between antiretroviral plasma concentration and emergence of HIV-1 resistance mutations at treatment failure
AU - Fabbiani, Massimiliano
AU - Bracciale, Laura
AU - Ragazzoni, Enzo
AU - Santangelo, Rosaria
AU - Cattani Franchi, Paola
AU - Di Giambenedetto, Simona
AU - Fadda, Giovanni
AU - Navarra, Pierluigi
AU - Cauda, Roberto
AU - De Luca, Andrea
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - PURPOSE: The relationship between antiretroviral pharmacokinetic exposure and
acquisition of human immunodeficency virus-1 (HIV-1) drug resistance mutations
(DRM) is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to investigate whether
antiretroviral plasma concentration could predict the emergence of DRM at
treatment failure.
METHODS: The study cohort comprised retrospectively selected patients with
failing antiretroviral regimens for whom a protease inhibitor (PI) or
non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) trough concentration
measurement (TDM) had been obtained before failure, a genotypic resistance test
(GRT1) had been performed before the TDM, and a genotypic resistance test (GRT2)
had been performed at therapeutic failure. Drug levels were classified as
undetectable/detectable or subtherapeutic/therapeutic according to limits of
quantification of a high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet assay or
pre-defined efficacy thresholds, respectively. The number of DRM acquired at
treatment failure was evaluated by comparing the results of the GRT2 and GRT1.
RESULTS: A total of ten and 57 failure episodes occurred among our patients on
NNRTI-based and PI-based regimens, respectively, and included in the evaluation.
PI concentration was subtherapeutic in 28.1% of patients, among which the levels
were undetectable in 21.1%. Twenty-five (43.9%) patients acquired at least one
new PI-DRM according to the GRT2. Patients with undetectable PI levels showed a
lower emergence of PI-DRM (minor + major) than those with detectable levels (8.3
vs. 53.3%, p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis confirmed that undetectable PI
levels were independent negative predictors of DRM selection. NNRTI measurements
were subtherapeutic in 2/10 (20%) patients. NNRTI-DRM were acquired by all
patients regardless of NNRTI levels.
CONCLUSIONS: A PI measurement showing undetectable drug levels prior to treatment
failure predicted the lack of emergence of PI-DRM at failure. These results
suggest that PI levels can help clinicians interpret the reasons for treatment
failure and guide the type of interventions needed.
AB - PURPOSE: The relationship between antiretroviral pharmacokinetic exposure and
acquisition of human immunodeficency virus-1 (HIV-1) drug resistance mutations
(DRM) is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to investigate whether
antiretroviral plasma concentration could predict the emergence of DRM at
treatment failure.
METHODS: The study cohort comprised retrospectively selected patients with
failing antiretroviral regimens for whom a protease inhibitor (PI) or
non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) trough concentration
measurement (TDM) had been obtained before failure, a genotypic resistance test
(GRT1) had been performed before the TDM, and a genotypic resistance test (GRT2)
had been performed at therapeutic failure. Drug levels were classified as
undetectable/detectable or subtherapeutic/therapeutic according to limits of
quantification of a high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet assay or
pre-defined efficacy thresholds, respectively. The number of DRM acquired at
treatment failure was evaluated by comparing the results of the GRT2 and GRT1.
RESULTS: A total of ten and 57 failure episodes occurred among our patients on
NNRTI-based and PI-based regimens, respectively, and included in the evaluation.
PI concentration was subtherapeutic in 28.1% of patients, among which the levels
were undetectable in 21.1%. Twenty-five (43.9%) patients acquired at least one
new PI-DRM according to the GRT2. Patients with undetectable PI levels showed a
lower emergence of PI-DRM (minor + major) than those with detectable levels (8.3
vs. 53.3%, p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis confirmed that undetectable PI
levels were independent negative predictors of DRM selection. NNRTI measurements
were subtherapeutic in 2/10 (20%) patients. NNRTI-DRM were acquired by all
patients regardless of NNRTI levels.
CONCLUSIONS: A PI measurement showing undetectable drug levels prior to treatment
failure predicted the lack of emergence of PI-DRM at failure. These results
suggest that PI levels can help clinicians interpret the reasons for treatment
failure and guide the type of interventions needed.
KW - HIV
KW - HIV
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/5715
U2 - 10.1007/s15010-011-0183-8
DO - 10.1007/s15010-011-0183-8
M3 - Article
SN - 0300-8126
SP - 563
EP - 569
JO - Infection
JF - Infection
ER -