Abstract
With the order in question, the Tribunal of Napoli, agrarian section, deems its competence to decide of the
claim against the decision suspending the enforcement procedure for the release, ex art. 624 cod. proc. civ.,
deliberated from the same Tribunal, agrarian section, as appellate court for the enforcement. The matter
regarding the competence to decide on the claim lodged against a precautionary measure issued by a Court is
controversial since the introduction of the remedy ex art. 669 terdecies cod. proc. civ., which doesn’t explicitly
regulate such hypothesis. The explanatory statement will acknowledge the opposing interpretations, backed
up both by the doctrine and the jurisprudence, on the competence of the same deciding Tribunal even if in
different composition, or of the nearest Tribunal, or of the Court of Appeal having local jurisdiction. The
conclusion of the statement will expose the preference for the thesis recognizing the competence of the Court
of Appeal.
Titolo tradotto del contributo | [Autom. eng. transl.] Precautionary complaint and jurisdiction of the specialized agricultural section |
---|---|
Lingua originale | Italian |
pagine (da-a) | 107-117 |
Numero di pagine | 11 |
Rivista | RIVISTA DI DIRITTO AGRARIO |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2022 |
Keywords
- Contratti agrari
- Sezione specializzata agraria
- Reclamo cautelare