Abstract
In the current debate on the nature of time one can identify two competing
positions: the eternalist (B-series) and the Aristotelian (A-series) position.
Which is the adequate one? I argue for the reality of becoming (A-series) on
the basis of the experience, undeniable even for an eternalist, of the change
of appearance in consciousness. I begin with formal characterizations of the
A-theory and the B-theory on the general phenomenon of becoming. Th en,
I analyse the notion of change of appearing to consciousness. It turns out that
it is not possible to provide an account of it in B-theoretical terms. For at
least one state of aff airs p of phenomenal nature it is certain that the reality
of becoming is given: A(before, p) ∧ ¬A(now, p).
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
Titolo della pubblicazione ospite | Time and History. Zeit und Geschichte |
Editor | Friedrich Stadler, Michael Stoeltzner |
Pagine | 63-76 |
Numero di pagine | 14 |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2006 |
Pubblicato esternamente | Sì |
Keywords
- A-Theory
- A-serie
- B-Theory
- B-serie
- Philosophy of Time
- Tempo e divenire
- Tensed Theory of Time
- Teoria tensionale del tempo