Ratio and modus essendi of the categories. Thomas Aquinas, Henry of Ghent and John Duns Scotus

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

In the Middle Ages, the transmission and the reception of Aristotle's Categories, together with Porphyrius's isagoge, a work that had driven to a predominantly logical-linguistic approach, have led to both extensional and intensional interpretation about categories. This exegesis found support also from the second intentions doctrine and their relation with reality. The determining ontological status of categories moves in parallel with universals' theories, while second intentions allow understanding the categories' general character. Categories' theory is based on lexical signification doctrine, associated with an ontology. Here we'll examine Thomas Aquinas', Henry of Ghent's, and John Duns Scotus' positions.
Titolo tradotto del contributo[Autom. eng. transl.] Ratio and modus essendi of the categories. Thomas Aquinas, Henry of Ghent and John Duns Scotus
Lingua originaleItalian
pagine (da-a)567-582
Numero di pagine16
RivistaRIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA NEOSCOLASTICA
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2017

Keywords

  • Categories
  • Modus essendi
  • Ratio essendi
  • Second intentions

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Ratio and modus essendi of the categories. Thomas Aquinas, Henry of Ghent and John Duns Scotus'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo