RAS Mutation Clinical Risk Score to Predict Survival After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases

  • Kristoffer W. Brudvik
  • , Robert P. Jones
  • , Felice Giuliante
  • , Junichi Shindoh
  • , Guillaume Passot
  • , Michael H. Chung
  • , Juhee Song
  • , Liang Li
  • , Vegar J. Dagenborg
  • , Åsmund A. Fretland
  • , Bård Røsok
  • , Agostino M. de Rose
  • , Francesco Ardito
  • , Bjørn Edwin
  • , Elena Panettieri
  • , Luigi M. Larocca
  • , Suguru Yamashita
  • , Claudius Conrad
  • , Thomas A. Aloia
  • , Graeme J. Poston
  • Bjørn A. Bjørnbeth, Jean-Nicolas Vauthey*
*Autore corrispondente per questo lavoro

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:: To determine the impact of RAS mutation status on the traditional clinical score (t-CS) to predict survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). BACKGROUND:: The t-CS relies on the following factors: primary tumor nodal status, disease-free interval, number and size of CLM, and carcinoembryonic antigen level. We hypothesized that the addition of RAS mutation status could create a modified clinical score (m-CS) that would outperform the t-CS. METHODS:: Patients who underwent resection of CLM from 2005 through 2013 and had RAS mutation status and t-CS factors available were included. Multivariate analysis was used to identify prognostic factors to include in the m-CS. Log-rank survival analyses were used to compare the t-CS and the m-CS. The m-CS was validated in an international multicenter cohort of 608 patients. RESULTS:: A total of 564 patients were eligible for analysis. RAS mutation was detected in 205 (36.3%) of patients. On multivariate analysis, RAS mutation was associated with poor overall survival, as were positive primary tumor lymph node status and diameter of the largest liver metastasis >50?mm. Each factor was assigned 1 point to produce a m-CS. The m-CS accurately stratified patients by overall and recurrence-free survival in both the initial patient series and validation cohort, whereas the t-CS did not. CONCLUSIONS:: Modifying the t-CS by replacing disease-free interval, number of metastases, and CEA level with RAS mutation status produced an m-CS that outperformed the t-CS. The m-CS is therefore a simple validated tool that predicts survival after resection of CLM.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)120-126
Numero di pagine7
RivistaAnnals of Surgery
Volume269
Numero di pubblicazione1
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Chirurgia

Keywords

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'RAS Mutation Clinical Risk Score to Predict Survival After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo