Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Study Comparing Patupilone (EPO906) With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Platinum-Refractory or -Resistant Patients With Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Primary Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer

Nicoletta Colombo, Elzbieta Kutarska, Meletios Dimopoulos, Duk-Soo Bae, Izabella Rzepka-Gorska, Mariusz Bidzinski, Giovanni Scambia, Svend Aage Engelholm, Florence Joly, Dirk Weber, Mona El-Hashimy, Jingjin Li, Farida Souami, Patricia Wing, Silke Engelholm, Aristotelis Bamias, Peter Schwartz

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

86 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of patupilone with those of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with platinum-refractory or -resistant epithelial ovarian, primary fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with three or fewer prior regimens were eligible if they had received first-line taxane/platinum-based combination chemotherapy and were platinum refractory or resistant. Patients were randomly assigned to receive patupilone (10 mg/m(2) intravenously every 3 weeks) or PLD (50 mg/m(2) intravenously every 4 weeks). RESULTS: A total of 829 patients were randomly assigned (patupilone, n = 412; PLD, n = 417). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS), the primary end point, between the patupilone and PLD arms (P = .195; hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.09), with median OS rates of 13.2 and 12.7 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months for both arms. The overall response rate (all partial responses) was higher in the patupilone arm than in the PLD arm (15.5% v 7.9%; odds ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.36 to 3.29), although disease control rates were similar (59.5% v 56.3%, respectively). Frequently observed adverse events (AEs) of any grade included diarrhea (85.3%) and peripheral neuropathy (39.3%) in the patupilone arm and mucositis/stomatitis (43%) and hand-foot syndrome (41.8%) in the PLD arm. CONCLUSION: Patupilone did not demonstrate significant improvement in OS compared with the active control, PLD. No new or unexpected serious AEs were identified.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)3841-3847
Numero di pagine7
RivistaJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume30
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2012

Keywords

  • Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Study Comparing Patupilone (EPO906) With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Platinum-Refractory or -Resistant Patients With Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Primary Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo