Abstract
The role of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in high-risk acute patients remains debated. Device-related complications and the more complex patient management could explain such lack of clinical benefit. We aimed to assess the impact of transradial versus transfemoral access for PCI requiring IABP support on vascular complications and clinical outcome.
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 1019-1026 |
| Numero di pagine | 8 |
| Rivista | American Heart Journal |
| Volume | 166 |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2013 |
Keywords
- Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Female
- Femoral Artery
- Humans
- Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Myocardial Infarction
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Radial Artery
- Retrospective Studies
- Treatment Outcome
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver