Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry

Francesco Burzotta, Filippo Crea, Carlo Trani, Enrico Romagnoli, Maria De Vita, Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai, Bernardo Cortese, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Valerio Lucci, Caterina Cavazza, Fabio Tarantino, Giuseppe M. Sangiorgi, Sunil V. Rao

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

25 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

The role of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in high-risk acute patients remains debated. Device-related complications and the more complex patient management could explain such lack of clinical benefit. We aimed to assess the impact of transradial versus transfemoral access for PCI requiring IABP support on vascular complications and clinical outcome.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)1019-1026
Numero di pagine8
RivistaAmerican Heart Journal
Volume166
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2013

Keywords

  • Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Femoral Artery
  • Humans
  • Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Radial Artery
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo