Abstract
The essay focuses on frauds linked to certain tax credits (so called Superbonus), analysing the potential liabilities of institutional investors who have acquired the credits, without any involvement in the frauds. Case-law drew, in fact, a very thin and ambiguous line between bona fide and mala fide purchasers, not only allowing confiscation towards such investors but also outlining potential criminal liabilities for whoever compensates a credit after having discovered its fraudulent origin. A very recent law tried to better clarify the overall picture
Titolo tradotto del contributo | [Autom. eng. transl.] Theoretical issues and substantial paradoxes regarding the so-called debt seizure Super bonus for financial intermediaries |
---|---|
Lingua originale | Italian |
pagine (da-a) | 850-873 |
Numero di pagine | 24 |
Rivista | GIURISPRUDENZA COMMERCIALE |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2023 |
Keywords
- crediti superbonus
- crediti inesistenti
- indebita compensazione