TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality-of-life analysis of the MITO-8, MaNGO, BGOG-Ov1, AGO-Ovar2.16, ENGOT-Ov1, GCIG study comparing platinum-based versus non-platinumbased chemotherapy in patients with partially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer
AU - Piccirillo, M. C.
AU - Scambia, Giovanni
AU - Bologna, A.
AU - Signoriello, S.
AU - Vergote, I.
AU - Baumann, K.
AU - Lorusso, D.
AU - Murgia, V.
AU - Sorio, R.
AU - Ferrandina, Maria Gabriella
AU - Sacco, C.
AU - Cormio, G.
AU - Breda, E.
AU - Cinieri, S.
AU - Natale, D.
AU - Mangili, G.
AU - Pisano, C.
AU - Cecere, S. C.
AU - Di Napoli, M.
AU - Salutari, Vanda
AU - Raspagliesi, F.
AU - Arenare, L.
AU - Bergamini, A.
AU - Bryce, J.
AU - Daniele, G.
AU - Gallo, C.
AU - Pignata, Sandro
AU - Perrone, F.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Background: MITO-8 showed that prolonging platinum-free interval by introducing non-platinum-based chemotherapy (NPBC) does not improve prognosis of patients with partially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Quality of life (QoL) was a secondary outcome. Patients and methods: Ovarian cancer patients recurring or progressing 6-12 months after previous platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) were randomized to receive PBC or NPBC as first treatment. QoL was assessed at baseline, third and sixth cycles, with the EORTC C-30 and OV-28 questionnaires. Mean changes and best response were analysed. Progression-free survival, response rate, and toxicity are also reported for proper interpretation of data. All analyses were based on intentionto- treat. Results: Out of the 215 patients, 151 (70.2%) completed baseline questionnaire, balanced between the arms; thereafter, missing rate was higher in the NPBC arm. At mean change analysis, C30 scores were prevalently worse in the NPBC than PBC arm, statistical significance being attained for emotional functioning, global health status/QoL, fatigue, and dyspnoea (effect sizes ranging from 0.30 to 0.51). Conversely, as for OV28 scale, the other chemotherapy side-effects item was significantly worse with PBC at three and six cycles, with a larger effect size (0.70 and 0.54, respectively). At best response analysis, improvement of emotional functioning and pain and worsening of peripheral neuropathy and other chemotherapy side-effects were significantly more frequent in the PBC arm. Progression-free survival (median 9 versus 5 months, P=0.001) and objective response rate (51.6% versus 19.4%, P=0.0001) were significantly better with PBC. Allergy, blood cell count, alopecia, nausea, musculoskeletal, and neurological side-effects were more frequent and severe with PBC; hand-foot skin reaction, rash/ desquamation, mucositis, and vascular events were more frequent with NPBC. Conclusion: MITO-8 QoL analysis shows that deterioration of some functioning and symptom scales is lower with PBC, with improvement of emotional functioning and pain, despite worsening of toxicity-related items.
AB - Background: MITO-8 showed that prolonging platinum-free interval by introducing non-platinum-based chemotherapy (NPBC) does not improve prognosis of patients with partially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Quality of life (QoL) was a secondary outcome. Patients and methods: Ovarian cancer patients recurring or progressing 6-12 months after previous platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) were randomized to receive PBC or NPBC as first treatment. QoL was assessed at baseline, third and sixth cycles, with the EORTC C-30 and OV-28 questionnaires. Mean changes and best response were analysed. Progression-free survival, response rate, and toxicity are also reported for proper interpretation of data. All analyses were based on intentionto- treat. Results: Out of the 215 patients, 151 (70.2%) completed baseline questionnaire, balanced between the arms; thereafter, missing rate was higher in the NPBC arm. At mean change analysis, C30 scores were prevalently worse in the NPBC than PBC arm, statistical significance being attained for emotional functioning, global health status/QoL, fatigue, and dyspnoea (effect sizes ranging from 0.30 to 0.51). Conversely, as for OV28 scale, the other chemotherapy side-effects item was significantly worse with PBC at three and six cycles, with a larger effect size (0.70 and 0.54, respectively). At best response analysis, improvement of emotional functioning and pain and worsening of peripheral neuropathy and other chemotherapy side-effects were significantly more frequent in the PBC arm. Progression-free survival (median 9 versus 5 months, P=0.001) and objective response rate (51.6% versus 19.4%, P=0.0001) were significantly better with PBC. Allergy, blood cell count, alopecia, nausea, musculoskeletal, and neurological side-effects were more frequent and severe with PBC; hand-foot skin reaction, rash/ desquamation, mucositis, and vascular events were more frequent with NPBC. Conclusion: MITO-8 QoL analysis shows that deterioration of some functioning and symptom scales is lower with PBC, with improvement of emotional functioning and pain, despite worsening of toxicity-related items.
KW - Hematology
KW - Non-platinum-based chemotherapy
KW - Oncology
KW - Ovarian cancer
KW - Partially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer
KW - Phase III randomised trial
KW - Platinum-based chemotherapy
KW - Quality of life
KW - Hematology
KW - Non-platinum-based chemotherapy
KW - Oncology
KW - Ovarian cancer
KW - Partially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer
KW - Phase III randomised trial
KW - Platinum-based chemotherapy
KW - Quality of life
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/122316
UR - http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/
U2 - 10.1093/annonc/mdy062
DO - 10.1093/annonc/mdy062
M3 - Article
SN - 0923-7534
VL - 29
SP - 1189
EP - 1194
JO - Annals of Oncology
JF - Annals of Oncology
ER -