Abstract
Objective A prospective multicenter randomized trial was designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of postoperative protein-sparing therapy.Summary Background Data The metabolic effect of postoperative protein-sparing therapy has been shown by several studies, but the clinical utility of this treatment has not been investigated by large prospective trials.Methods Six hundred seventy-eight patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to receive either protein-sparing therapy after surgery (protein-sparing therapy group) or conventional therapy (control group). The patients were monitored for postoperative complications and mortality.Results The rate of major postoperative complications was similar in both groups (protein-sparing therapy group, 19.5%; control group, 20.9%; p = 0.66) as were the overall postoperative mortality rates (4.7% and 3.5%, respectively; p = 0.43).Conclusions The present study indicates that routine protein-sparing therapy for patients normonourished or mildly malnourished undergoing major abdominal surgery is not clinically justified.
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
pagine (da-a) | 357-362 |
Numero di pagine | 6 |
Rivista | Annals of Surgery |
Volume | 223 |
DOI | |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 1996 |
Keywords
- Protein-sparing therapy after major abdominal surgery