TY - JOUR
T1 - Protective Role of Conization Before Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study
AU - Bizzarri, Nicolo'
AU - Pedone Anchora, Luigi
AU - Kucukmetin, Ali
AU - Ratnavelu, Nithya
AU - Korompelis, Porfyrios
AU - Carbone, Maria Vittoria
AU - Fedele, Camilla
AU - Bruno, Matteo
AU - Vizzielli, Giuseppe
AU - Gallotta, Valerio
AU - De Vincenzo, Rosa Pasqualina
AU - Chiantera, Vito
AU - Fagotti, Anna
AU - Fanfani, Francesco
AU - Ferrandina, Maria Gabriella
AU - Scambia, Giovanni
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic role and the perioperative outcomes of conization performed before radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study included patients with FIGO 2009 stage IB1 cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy between June 2004 and June 2019. Patients were divided into two groups according to conization before radical surgery. One-to-one case–control matching was used to adjust the baseline characteristics. Results: A total of 332 patients were included after propensity matching (166, 50% in each group). Twenty-four of 166 (14.4%) and 142 of 166 (85.6%) conization patients had negative and positive surgical margins on the conization specimen, respectively. No difference in intra- and postoperative complications was noted between the two groups (p = 0.542 and p = 0.180, respectively). Patients undergoing conization before radical hysterectomy received less adjuvant treatment (p < 0.001) and had a better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) than patients who did not receive conization (89.8% vs. 80.0%, respectively; p = 0.010). No difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) (97.1% vs. 91.4%, respectively; p = 0.114) or recurrence pattern (p = 0.115) was reported between the two groups. Factors independently related to higher risk of recurrence were pathologic tumor diameter >20 mm and no conization before radical hysterectomy (p = 0.011 and p = 0.018, respectively). The only independent variable influencing OS was pathologic tumor diameter >20 mm (p = 0.020). Conclusions: Conization before radical hysterectomy was associated with improved DFS and lower probability of receiving adjuvant treatment. No difference in perioperative complications and OS was evident. Tumor diameter >20 mm was found to be the only independent risk factor affecting OS in both groups.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic role and the perioperative outcomes of conization performed before radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study included patients with FIGO 2009 stage IB1 cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy between June 2004 and June 2019. Patients were divided into two groups according to conization before radical surgery. One-to-one case–control matching was used to adjust the baseline characteristics. Results: A total of 332 patients were included after propensity matching (166, 50% in each group). Twenty-four of 166 (14.4%) and 142 of 166 (85.6%) conization patients had negative and positive surgical margins on the conization specimen, respectively. No difference in intra- and postoperative complications was noted between the two groups (p = 0.542 and p = 0.180, respectively). Patients undergoing conization before radical hysterectomy received less adjuvant treatment (p < 0.001) and had a better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) than patients who did not receive conization (89.8% vs. 80.0%, respectively; p = 0.010). No difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) (97.1% vs. 91.4%, respectively; p = 0.114) or recurrence pattern (p = 0.115) was reported between the two groups. Factors independently related to higher risk of recurrence were pathologic tumor diameter >20 mm and no conization before radical hysterectomy (p = 0.011 and p = 0.018, respectively). The only independent variable influencing OS was pathologic tumor diameter >20 mm (p = 0.020). Conclusions: Conization before radical hysterectomy was associated with improved DFS and lower probability of receiving adjuvant treatment. No difference in perioperative complications and OS was evident. Tumor diameter >20 mm was found to be the only independent risk factor affecting OS in both groups.
KW - Conization
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Hysterectomy
KW - Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
KW - Neoplasm Staging
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
KW - Conization
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Hysterectomy
KW - Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
KW - Neoplasm Staging
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/206596
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-021-09695-4
DO - 10.1245/s10434-021-09695-4
M3 - Article
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 28
SP - 3585
EP - 3594
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
ER -