TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic factors of lung cancer in lymphoma survivors (the LuCiLyS study)
AU - Fiorelli, Alfonso
AU - D'Andrilli, Antonio
AU - Carlucci, Annalisa
AU - Vicidomini, Giovanni
AU - Loizzi, Domenico
AU - Ardò, Nicoletta Pia
AU - Marasco, Rita Daniela
AU - Ventura, Luigi
AU - Ampollini, Luca
AU - Carbognani, Paolo
AU - Bocchialini, Giovanni
AU - Lococo, Filippo
AU - Paci, Massimiliano
AU - Di Stefano, Teresa Severina
AU - Ardissone, Francesco
AU - Gagliasso, Matteo
AU - Mendogni, Paolo
AU - Rosso, Lorenzo
AU - Mazzucco, Alessandra
AU - Vanni, Camilla
AU - Marinucci, Beatrice Trabalza
AU - Potenza, Rossella
AU - Matricardi, Alberto
AU - Ragusa, Mark
AU - Tassi, Valentina
AU - Anile, Marco
AU - Poggi, Camilla
AU - Serra, Nicola
AU - Sica, Antonello
AU - Nosotti, Mario
AU - Sollitto, Francesco
AU - Venuta, Federico
AU - Rendina, Erino Angelo
AU - Puma, Francesco
AU - Santini, Mario
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background: Second cancer is the leading cause of death in lymphoma survivors, with lung cancer representing the most common solid tumor. Limited information exists about the treatment and prognosis of second lung cancer following lymphoma. Herein, we evaluated the outcome and prognostic factors of Lung Cancer in Lymphoma Survivors (the LuCiLyS study) to improve the patient selection for lung cancer treatment. Methods: This is a retrospective multicentre study including consecutive patients treated for lymphoma disease that subsequently developed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data regarding lymphoma including age, symptoms, histology, disease stage, treatment received and lymphoma status at the time of lung cancer diagnosis, and data on lung carcinoma as age, smoking history, latency from lymphoma, symptoms, histology, disease stage, treatment received, and survival were evaluated to identify the significant prognostic factors for overall survival. Results: Our study population included 164 patients, 145 of which underwent lung cancer resection. The median overall survival was 63 (range, 58-85) months, and the 5-year survival rate 54%. At univariable analysis no-active lymphoma (HR: 2.19; P=0.0152); early lymphoma stage (HR: 1.95; P=0.01); adenocarcinoma histology (HR: 0.59; P=0.0421); early lung cancer stage (HR: 3.18; P<0.0001); incidental diagnosis of lung cancer (HR: 1.71; P<0.0001); and lung cancer resection (HR: 2.79; P<0.0001) were favorable prognostic factors. At multivariable analysis, no-active lymphoma (HR: 2.68; P=0.004); early lung cancer stage (HR: 2.37; P<0.0001); incidental diagnosis of lung cancer (HR: 2.00; P<0.0001); and lung cancer resection (HR: 2.07; P<0.0001) remained favorable prognostic factors. Patients with non-active lymphoma (n=146) versus those with active lymphoma (n=18) at lung cancer diagnosis presented better median survival (64 vs. 37 months; HR: 2.4; P=0.02), but median lung cancer specific survival showed no significant difference (27 vs. 19 months; HR: 0.3; P=0.17). Conclusions: The presence and/or a history of lymphoma should not be a contraindication to resection of lung cancer. Inclusion of lymphoma survivors in a lung cancer-screening program may lead to early detection of lung cancer, and improve the survival.
AB - Background: Second cancer is the leading cause of death in lymphoma survivors, with lung cancer representing the most common solid tumor. Limited information exists about the treatment and prognosis of second lung cancer following lymphoma. Herein, we evaluated the outcome and prognostic factors of Lung Cancer in Lymphoma Survivors (the LuCiLyS study) to improve the patient selection for lung cancer treatment. Methods: This is a retrospective multicentre study including consecutive patients treated for lymphoma disease that subsequently developed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data regarding lymphoma including age, symptoms, histology, disease stage, treatment received and lymphoma status at the time of lung cancer diagnosis, and data on lung carcinoma as age, smoking history, latency from lymphoma, symptoms, histology, disease stage, treatment received, and survival were evaluated to identify the significant prognostic factors for overall survival. Results: Our study population included 164 patients, 145 of which underwent lung cancer resection. The median overall survival was 63 (range, 58-85) months, and the 5-year survival rate 54%. At univariable analysis no-active lymphoma (HR: 2.19; P=0.0152); early lymphoma stage (HR: 1.95; P=0.01); adenocarcinoma histology (HR: 0.59; P=0.0421); early lung cancer stage (HR: 3.18; P<0.0001); incidental diagnosis of lung cancer (HR: 1.71; P<0.0001); and lung cancer resection (HR: 2.79; P<0.0001) were favorable prognostic factors. At multivariable analysis, no-active lymphoma (HR: 2.68; P=0.004); early lung cancer stage (HR: 2.37; P<0.0001); incidental diagnosis of lung cancer (HR: 2.00; P<0.0001); and lung cancer resection (HR: 2.07; P<0.0001) remained favorable prognostic factors. Patients with non-active lymphoma (n=146) versus those with active lymphoma (n=18) at lung cancer diagnosis presented better median survival (64 vs. 37 months; HR: 2.4; P=0.02), but median lung cancer specific survival showed no significant difference (27 vs. 19 months; HR: 0.3; P=0.17). Conclusions: The presence and/or a history of lymphoma should not be a contraindication to resection of lung cancer. Inclusion of lymphoma survivors in a lung cancer-screening program may lead to early detection of lung cancer, and improve the survival.
KW - Lung cancer
KW - Lymphoma
KW - Second primary tumor
KW - Lung cancer
KW - Lymphoma
KW - Second primary tumor
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/151895
U2 - 10.21037/tlcr.2019.12.28
DO - 10.21037/tlcr.2019.12.28
M3 - Article
SN - 2218-6751
VL - 9
SP - 90
EP - 102
JO - Translational Lung Cancer Research
JF - Translational Lung Cancer Research
ER -