Abstract
"Probiotic” is a generic term that includes a large number
of species of microorganisms, specifically lactobacilli
and bifidobacteria. Probiotics are among the most active
ingredients present in foods; the definition of “probiotics,”
which implies beneficial effects on health, is therefore
considered by the European Union as a health claim per se.
Adequately characterising the probiotic bacteria tested
in a study is mandatory for them to be subject to a
consumer health claim, as stipulated by the European Food
Safety Authority (EFSA).
Probiotics cannot be properly evaluated as a class, but
rather need to be judged on a single-strain basis.
This characterization should be performed at the
strain level, a rule that is not always adhered to in scientific
publications. Indeed, the clinical effects of probiotics, in
treatment or prevention, depend on the specific bacteria,
which should be defined not only by their genus and
species, but also at the strain level.
At the end of 2006, the European Union approved a
Regulation allowing the use of nutritional and health claims
for food and food supplements. Two types of health claim
have been allowed. The first type of claim refers to the
functions of the body, including psychological and behavioral
functions and weight control. These claims are also
called “generic claims,” as it is assumed that these
functional properties could be shared by all food containing
the selected active ingredient(s). The second group of
allowed claims refers to reduction of disease risk; in this
case the authorization will be specific for each food product
applying for the claim. The substantiation of the scientific
background supporting the request of claims is the
challenge for 2009 for the scientists providing advice to
the EFSA. Opinions voiced by the EFSA in July 2009 with
regard to probiotic claims were all negative.
A clinical effect of probiotic bacteria should be
attributed only to those strains that have demonstrated
one. Conversely, when a strain does not elicit a given
clinical effect, this does not mean that no other strain can
produce it. A comparison was made with vitamins, as, for
example, not all prevent scurvy or increase calcium
absorption but this does not imply that they are ineffective
in health maintenance. For supplements of vitamins and
minerals, Regulation 2002/46/ specifies that only nutrient
sources whose safety and bioavailability have been assessed
by the EFSA and listed in the relevant Annex of the
Directive can continue to be used in food supplements from
1 January 2010.
These are the items largely discussed during the 5th
Congress on “Probiotics Prebiotics and New Foods” in
Rome from 13 to 15 September 2009 and in part reported in
this issue of Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
pagine (da-a) | N/A-N/A |
Rivista | Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology |
Volume | 2010; 44:S1 |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2010 |
Keywords
- Claims
- Food Safety
- Probiotics