Practice of ultrasound-guided arthrocentesis and joint injection, including training and implementation, in Europe: Results of a survey of experts and scientific societies

Maria Antonietta D'Agostino, Peter Mandl, Esperanza Naredo, Philip G. Conaghan, Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino, Richard J. Wakefield, Artur Bachta, Marina Backhaus, Hilde B. Hammer, George A. W. Bruyn, Nemanja Damjanov, Emilio Filippucci, Walter Grassi, Annamaria Iagnocco, Sandrine Jousse-Joulin, David Kane, Juhani M. Koski, Ingrid Möller, Eugenio De Miguel, Wolfgang A. SchmidtWijnand A. A. Swen, Marcin Szkudlarek, Lene Terslev, Hans-Rudolf Ziswiler, Mikkel Østergaard, Peter V. Balint

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

27 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To document the practice and training opportunities of US-guided arthrocentesis and joint injection (UGAJ) among rheumatologists in the member countries of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). Methods: An English-language questionnaire, containing questions on demographics, clinical and practical aspects of UGAJ, training options in UGAJ for rheumatologists, UGAJ education in the rheumatology training curriculum and other structured education programmes in UGAJ was sent to three different groups: (i) all national rheumatology societies of EULAR; (ii) all national societies of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB); and (iii) 22 senior rheumatologists involved in EULAR musculoskeletal US training from 14 European countries, who were also asked to circulate the questionnaire among relevant colleagues. Results: Thirty-three (75%) of 44 countries responded to the questionnaire (61.3% of national rheumatology societies, 25% of the national US societies and 100% of expert ultrasonographers). In the majority of countries (85%) <10% of rheumatologists routinely perform UGAJ in clinical practice, while the remaining countries (15%) reported a rate of 10-50%. The percentage of rheumatologists receiving training in UGAJ was <10% in the majority (72.7%) of countries. Conclusion: The study highlights the relatively low prevalence of UGAJ as compared with the high (>80%) rate of rheumatologists performing conventional joint injection in most of the surveyed countries. The reported variations in practice and the lack of available structured training programmes for trainees in most countries indicates the need for standardization in areas including training guidelines. © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)184-190
Numero di pagine7
RivistaRheumatology
Volume51
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2012

Keywords

  • Education
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional
  • Musculoskeletal ultrasound
  • Training
  • Ultrasound-guided arthrocentesis
  • Ultrasound-guided joint injection
  • Education, Medical, Continuing
  • Europe
  • Health Care Surveys
  • Humans
  • Injections, Intra-Articular
  • Musculoskeletal Diseases
  • Paracentesis
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Professional Practice
  • Radiology
  • Rheumatology
  • Societies, Medical

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Practice of ultrasound-guided arthrocentesis and joint injection, including training and implementation, in Europe: Results of a survey of experts and scientific societies'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo