TY - JOUR
T1 - Postoperative treatment of intermediate-risk early stage cervical cancer: results of a survey from the Gynecology Study Group in the AIRO Gyn and MITO Groups
AU - Perrucci, Elisabetta
AU - Cerrotta, Annamaria
AU - Macchia, Gabriella
AU - Augurio, Antonietta
AU - De Sanctis, Vitaliana
AU - Lazzari, Roberta
AU - Magri, Elena
AU - Marsella, Anna Rita
AU - Meregalli, Sofia
AU - Tamburo, Marinella
AU - Ferrandina, Maria Gabriella
AU - Aristei, Cynthia
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This survey investigated prognostic factors, treatment modalities, references followed and radiation oncologists' opinions to prescribe adjuvant therapy in early intermediate-risk cervical cancer. All but one recommended pelvic radiotherapy ± vaginal boost (45%) with or without chemotherapy (20%). 88% believed other prognostic factors could integrate classic risk criteria. 66% considered chemo-radiation indicated in case of lymphovascular invasion and suboptimal node dissection, high grade, size ≥ 4cm, non squamous histology and risk factors combination. This wide heterogeneity of treatments reflects the different guideline options due to the lack of defined indications. The need of integrating the classic prognostic factors with others factors was unanimously expressed by radiation oncologists. The best local and systemic therapy should be established through new studies. These results highlighted the need of a position paper to standardize adjuvant treatment in Italy and to design collaborative studies to clarify the controversial aspects.
AB - This survey investigated prognostic factors, treatment modalities, references followed and radiation oncologists' opinions to prescribe adjuvant therapy in early intermediate-risk cervical cancer. All but one recommended pelvic radiotherapy ± vaginal boost (45%) with or without chemotherapy (20%). 88% believed other prognostic factors could integrate classic risk criteria. 66% considered chemo-radiation indicated in case of lymphovascular invasion and suboptimal node dissection, high grade, size ≥ 4cm, non squamous histology and risk factors combination. This wide heterogeneity of treatments reflects the different guideline options due to the lack of defined indications. The need of integrating the classic prognostic factors with others factors was unanimously expressed by radiation oncologists. The best local and systemic therapy should be established through new studies. These results highlighted the need of a position paper to standardize adjuvant treatment in Italy and to design collaborative studies to clarify the controversial aspects.
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - adjuvant treatment
KW - intermediate-risk early stage
KW - radiotherapy, chemoradiation
KW - risk factors
KW - survey
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - adjuvant treatment
KW - intermediate-risk early stage
KW - radiotherapy, chemoradiation
KW - risk factors
KW - survey
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/206302
U2 - 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103704
DO - 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103704
M3 - Article
SN - 1040-8428
VL - 174
SP - N/A-N/A
JO - Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
JF - Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
ER -