TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance and matrix effect observed in QuEChERS extraction and tandem mass spectrometry analyses of pesticide residues in different target crops
AU - Lucini, Luigi
AU - Molinari, Gian Pietro
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - The method performance and matrix effect related to quantitative
determination of pesticide residues was assessed after QuEChERS
extraction and LC–MS–MS analysis. Dicloran, phosmet and
phosmet-oxon, pirimiphos-methyl, and BNOA were analyzed in
peach, apple, melon, cereals, tomato, and strawberry. The matrix
effects, as well as recovery and process efficiencies, were
determined for a fungicide, two insecticides, and a plant growth
regulator. Crop samples are spiked either pre- or post-extraction,
then the peak area was compared with the peak area in neat
solvent. The mean recovery ranged from 73% to 98%, and
repeatability (as RSD) was between 3% and 16%, depending on
the compound and spiking level. The matrix effect occurred as
ionic suppression and was found in the range of 5% to 22%
depending on the compound. Recovery efficiencies were good and
substantially comparable, being in the range of 93–96%. Although
the suppression observed still appears to be acceptable considering
the overall process efficiency, it seems evident that the matrix
effect is important when a reliable quantitative method must be
applied.
AB - The method performance and matrix effect related to quantitative
determination of pesticide residues was assessed after QuEChERS
extraction and LC–MS–MS analysis. Dicloran, phosmet and
phosmet-oxon, pirimiphos-methyl, and BNOA were analyzed in
peach, apple, melon, cereals, tomato, and strawberry. The matrix
effects, as well as recovery and process efficiencies, were
determined for a fungicide, two insecticides, and a plant growth
regulator. Crop samples are spiked either pre- or post-extraction,
then the peak area was compared with the peak area in neat
solvent. The mean recovery ranged from 73% to 98%, and
repeatability (as RSD) was between 3% and 16%, depending on
the compound and spiking level. The matrix effect occurred as
ionic suppression and was found in the range of 5% to 22%
depending on the compound. Recovery efficiencies were good and
substantially comparable, being in the range of 93–96%. Although
the suppression observed still appears to be acceptable considering
the overall process efficiency, it seems evident that the matrix
effect is important when a reliable quantitative method must be
applied.
KW - mass spectrometry
KW - suppression
KW - mass spectrometry
KW - suppression
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/9104
U2 - 10.1093/chrsci/49.9.709
DO - 10.1093/chrsci/49.9.709
M3 - Article
SN - 0021-9665
VL - 49
SP - 709
EP - 714
JO - Journal of Chromatographic Science
JF - Journal of Chromatographic Science
ER -