Abstract
This chapter compares two giants, in the history of economic thought, who stood at opposite poles. Paul Samuelson was one of the main architects – perhaps the main architect, and in any case the leading symbol – of what nowadays is known as Neoclassical economics – i.e. mainstream economics. Piero Sraffa was the most acute critical mind of Marginal, hence Neoclassical, economics and the leading promoter of a resumption of that Classical economic analysis, which – born on the eve of the Industrial Revolution – was (as he claims) “nipped in the bud”, and unduly submerged by the over-flowing of Marginal economic theory.
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
Titolo della pubblicazione ospite | Samuelsonian Economics and the Twenty-First Century |
Editor | Michael Szenberg, Lall Ramrattan, Aron Gottesman |
Pagine | 146-164 |
Numero di pagine | 19 |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2006 |
Keywords
- Neoclassical vs Classical economic theory
- Paul Samuelson
- Piero Sraffa
- Re-switching of techniques debate
- Standard commodity debate