TY - JOUR
T1 - Paclitaxel, epirubicin, and cisplatin (TEP) regimen as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced cervical cancer: long-term results
AU - Ferrandina, Maria Gabriella
AU - Distefano, Maria Grazia
AU - De Vincenzo, Rosa Pasqualina
AU - Salutari, Vanda
AU - Petrillo, Marco
AU - Scarciglia, Maria Lisa Rosaria
AU - Pietragalla, Antonella
AU - Conte, Caterina
AU - Scambia, Giovanni
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the rates of response, operability and long term survival and toxicities in a large series of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) patients administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with paclitaxel, epirubicin and cisplatin (TEP) followed by radical surgery (RS). Patients and methods The study included 75 consecutive stages IB2-IVA patients administered NACT with paclitaxel (175mg/m(2)), epirubicin (100mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (100mg/m(2)) on day 1 of a 3-weekly cycle for 2-4cycles. Patients were evaluated for objective response by RECIST criteria and triaged to RS. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the date of diagnosis to recurrence/progression of disease or death, respectively.
RESULTS: Complete and partial clinical response was observed in 13 and 28 patients (56.1% objective responses); radical surgery was amenable in 52 patients (71.2%): 14 patients showed complete/microscopic response to treatment. Overall, recurrence/progression of disease was observed in 36 patients, and all of them experienced death of disease. In the whole series median PFS was 48months (5-year PFS=51.0%), and median OS was 72months (5-year OS=53.0%). Overall, 195 courses were administered; treatment was delayed in 6.7% of patients, while dose reduction was required in 36.5% of patients. Grade 3 leukopenia affected 22 patients (29.7%), while Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia was documented in 17 (22.9%) and 6 (8.1%) patients. In the whole series, we recorded 1 death whose relation with treatment-induced toxicity could not be ruled out.
CONCLUSIONS: TEP provided favorable rates of response and operability in LACC patients, and allowed the obtainment of encouraging survival data without carrying out an excessive toxicity.
AB - OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the rates of response, operability and long term survival and toxicities in a large series of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) patients administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with paclitaxel, epirubicin and cisplatin (TEP) followed by radical surgery (RS). Patients and methods The study included 75 consecutive stages IB2-IVA patients administered NACT with paclitaxel (175mg/m(2)), epirubicin (100mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (100mg/m(2)) on day 1 of a 3-weekly cycle for 2-4cycles. Patients were evaluated for objective response by RECIST criteria and triaged to RS. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the date of diagnosis to recurrence/progression of disease or death, respectively.
RESULTS: Complete and partial clinical response was observed in 13 and 28 patients (56.1% objective responses); radical surgery was amenable in 52 patients (71.2%): 14 patients showed complete/microscopic response to treatment. Overall, recurrence/progression of disease was observed in 36 patients, and all of them experienced death of disease. In the whole series median PFS was 48months (5-year PFS=51.0%), and median OS was 72months (5-year OS=53.0%). Overall, 195 courses were administered; treatment was delayed in 6.7% of patients, while dose reduction was required in 36.5% of patients. Grade 3 leukopenia affected 22 patients (29.7%), while Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia was documented in 17 (22.9%) and 6 (8.1%) patients. In the whole series, we recorded 1 death whose relation with treatment-induced toxicity could not be ruled out.
CONCLUSIONS: TEP provided favorable rates of response and operability in LACC patients, and allowed the obtainment of encouraging survival data without carrying out an excessive toxicity.
KW - CERVICAL CANCER
KW - CERVICAL CANCER
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/43203
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.12.003
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.12.003
M3 - Article
SN - 1095-6859
VL - 2013
SP - N/A-N/A
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
ER -