TY - JOUR
T1 - One (Financial Well-Being) Model Fits All? Testing the Multidimensional Subjective Financial Well-Being Scale Across Nine Countries
AU - Sorgente, Angela
AU - Atay, B
AU - Aubrey, M
AU - Bhatia, S
AU - Crespo, C
AU - Fonseca, G
AU - Gueneri, OY
AU - Lep, Z
AU - Lessard, D
AU - Negru-Subtirica, O
AU - Portugal, A
AU - Ranta, M
AU - Relvas, AP
AU - Singh, N
AU - Sirsch, U
AU - Zupancic, M
AU - Lanz, Margherita
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - A multidimensional model of emerging adults' subjective financial well-being was proposed (Sorgente and Lanz, Int Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(5), 466-478 2019). The authors also developed a 5-factor scale (the Multidimensional Subjective Financial Well-being Scale, MSFWBS) intending to measure this construct in the European context. To date, data using this instrument have been collected in nine countries: Austria, Canada, Finland, India, Italy, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, and Turkey. In the current study, data from these countries were analysed to test the validity of this model internationally. In particular, using an international sample of 4,475 emerging adults, we collected the following kinds of validity evidence for the MSFWBS: score structure, reliability, generalizability, convergent, and criterion-related evidence. Findings suggest that the MSFWBS (1) yields valid and reliable scores, and (2) works well in individualistic and economically developed countries, producing comparable scores. Implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed.
AB - A multidimensional model of emerging adults' subjective financial well-being was proposed (Sorgente and Lanz, Int Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(5), 466-478 2019). The authors also developed a 5-factor scale (the Multidimensional Subjective Financial Well-being Scale, MSFWBS) intending to measure this construct in the European context. To date, data using this instrument have been collected in nine countries: Austria, Canada, Finland, India, Italy, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, and Turkey. In the current study, data from these countries were analysed to test the validity of this model internationally. In particular, using an international sample of 4,475 emerging adults, we collected the following kinds of validity evidence for the MSFWBS: score structure, reliability, generalizability, convergent, and criterion-related evidence. Findings suggest that the MSFWBS (1) yields valid and reliable scores, and (2) works well in individualistic and economically developed countries, producing comparable scores. Implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed.
KW - Subjective financial well-being
KW - Emerging adulthood
KW - Cross-national
KW - Approximate measurement invariance
KW - Validation
KW - Subjective financial well-being
KW - Emerging adulthood
KW - Cross-national
KW - Approximate measurement invariance
KW - Validation
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/316736
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85183714792&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85183714792&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1007/s10902-024-00708-z
DO - 10.1007/s10902-024-00708-z
M3 - Article
SN - 1389-4978
VL - 25
SP - 1
EP - 26
JO - Journal of Happiness Studies
JF - Journal of Happiness Studies
IS - 1-2
ER -