TY - JOUR
T1 - Oncoplastic Breast Surgery versus Conservative Mastectomy in the Management of Large Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): Surgical, Oncological, and Patient-Reported Outcomes
AU - Mason, Elena Jane
AU - Di Leone, Alba
AU - Franco, Antonio
AU - D’Archi, Sabatino
AU - Rianna, Chiara
AU - Sanchez, Alejandro Martin
AU - Murando, Federica
AU - Accetta, Cristina
AU - Scardina, Lorenzo
AU - Terribile, Daniela Andreina
AU - Masetti, Riccardo
AU - Franceschini, Gianluca
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Oncoplastic level II breast-conserving surgery (OPS2) allows for wider excisions than standard breast-conserving surgery, but the literature on this technique in the treatment of DCIS is scarce. This study compares OPS2 to conservative mastectomy (CM) in patients undergoing surgery for large DCIS. The clinical, radiological, surgical, and post-operative data of 147 patients who underwent either CM or OPS2 for large DCIS between 2007 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The surgical, oncological, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were analyzed and compared between the two groups. The surgical outcomes were similar, in terms of margin involvement (p = 0.211), complication rate (p = 0.827), and re-excision rate (p = 1). The rate of additional surgery for cosmetic optimization was significantly lower in the OPS2 group: only 1 (1.8%) patient required surgical adjustments versus 24 (26.4%) patients in the CM group (p < 0.001). The mean hospital stay was lower in the OPS2 group (p < 0.001). The oncological outcomes did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.662). The PRO analysis showed better outcomes in the OPS2 group, which achieved statistical significance in the sexual well-being module (p = 0.015). Skin sensitivity loss was also significantly lower in the OPS2 group (p < 0.001). When feasible, OPS2 should be considered in the treatment of large DCIS, as it is safe and shows high levels of patient satisfaction.
AB - Oncoplastic level II breast-conserving surgery (OPS2) allows for wider excisions than standard breast-conserving surgery, but the literature on this technique in the treatment of DCIS is scarce. This study compares OPS2 to conservative mastectomy (CM) in patients undergoing surgery for large DCIS. The clinical, radiological, surgical, and post-operative data of 147 patients who underwent either CM or OPS2 for large DCIS between 2007 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The surgical, oncological, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were analyzed and compared between the two groups. The surgical outcomes were similar, in terms of margin involvement (p = 0.211), complication rate (p = 0.827), and re-excision rate (p = 1). The rate of additional surgery for cosmetic optimization was significantly lower in the OPS2 group: only 1 (1.8%) patient required surgical adjustments versus 24 (26.4%) patients in the CM group (p < 0.001). The mean hospital stay was lower in the OPS2 group (p < 0.001). The oncological outcomes did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.662). The PRO analysis showed better outcomes in the OPS2 group, which achieved statistical significance in the sexual well-being module (p = 0.015). Skin sensitivity loss was also significantly lower in the OPS2 group (p < 0.001). When feasible, OPS2 should be considered in the treatment of large DCIS, as it is safe and shows high levels of patient satisfaction.
KW - BREAST-Q
KW - breast cancer
KW - breast-conserving therapy
KW - immediate breast reconstruction
KW - in situ
KW - large DCIS
KW - mastectomy
KW - oncoplastic surgery
KW - patient-reported outcomes
KW - BREAST-Q
KW - breast cancer
KW - breast-conserving therapy
KW - immediate breast reconstruction
KW - in situ
KW - large DCIS
KW - mastectomy
KW - oncoplastic surgery
KW - patient-reported outcomes
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/221764
U2 - 10.3390/cancers14225624
DO - 10.3390/cancers14225624
M3 - Article
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 14
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
ER -