Abstract
Was Weber merely a scientist, or was he something more than that? Today what meaning is
conveyed when we claim that a position, idea, or way of thinking falls under the Weberian rubric?
These questions can be answered in two different ways: historically and contextually, or conceptually
and analytically. Neither type of answer should be considered sovereign or autonomous.
They support and complement each other. But we have come to realize that even these answers
are insufficient, for today the Weberian legacy has spilled over into the broader public domain of
cultural commentary and political argument.
Weberian thought is no longer simply the property of protected enclaves of academic specialization
guarding the sacred texts, but has instead been applied to the problems of contemporary
public life and reimagined as a late addition to the most essential moral and political discourse
in Western civilization.
Titolo tradotto del contributo | [Autom. eng. transl.] Beyond the sacred text: the Weber "problem" and the perspectives of Weberian thought |
---|---|
Lingua originale | Italian |
pagine (da-a) | 49-64 |
Numero di pagine | 16 |
Rivista | STUDI DI SOCIOLOGIA |
Volume | 2016 |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2016 |
Keywords
- Conduct of life
- Menschentum
- Mode of questioning
- Weberian Social Science
- Western tradition