Off-site versus on-site clinical microbiology laboratory: a two-year comparison study of blood culture result reporting

Maurizio Sanguinetti; Brunella Posteraro; P. Posteraro; C. Gasparoli; F. M. Errico; G. Massaria

doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.021

Off-site versus on-site clinical microbiology laboratory: a two-year comparison study of blood culture result reporting

Maurizio Sanguinetti, Brunella Posteraro, P. Posteraro, C. Gasparoli, F. M. Errico, G. Massaria

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivista › Articolo in rivista

1 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

We analysed the blood culture (BC) result reporting at a small general hospital by a two-year comparison of on-site (year 2018) and off-site (year 2017) microbiology laboratory testing statuses. We observed that the turnaround times decreased and the positivity rates increased for the BCs processed in 2018 compared to those of 2017, and these differences were statistically significant. Our findings suggest that suboptimal preanalytical conditions, including delayed BC processing, may have negatively affected the BC outcomes in 2017.

Lingua originale	English
pagine (da-a)	N/A-N/A
Rivista	Clinical Microbiology and Infection
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.021
Stato di pubblicazione	Pubblicato - 2019

Keywords

Blood culture
Diagnostic workflow
Laboratory service
Positive bottles
System process optimization

Accesso al documento

10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.021

Altri file e collegamenti

Open Access link a IRIS PubliCatt

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Off-site versus on-site clinical microbiology laboratory: a two-year comparison study of blood culture result reporting'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo

@article{058f8c4675a64bfaacde635a77aec739,

title = "Off-site versus on-site clinical microbiology laboratory: a two-year comparison study of blood culture result reporting",

abstract = "We analysed the blood culture (BC) result reporting at a small general hospital by a two-year comparison of on-site (year 2018) and off-site (year 2017) microbiology laboratory testing statuses. We observed that the turnaround times decreased and the positivity rates increased for the BCs processed in 2018 compared to those of 2017, and these differences were statistically significant. Our findings suggest that suboptimal preanalytical conditions, including delayed BC processing, may have negatively affected the BC outcomes in 2017.",

keywords = "Blood culture, Diagnostic workflow, Laboratory service, Positive bottles, System process optimization, Blood culture, Diagnostic workflow, Laboratory service, Positive bottles, System process optimization",

author = "Maurizio Sanguinetti and Brunella Posteraro and P. Posteraro and C. Gasparoli and Errico, {F. M.} and G. Massaria",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.021",

language = "English",

pages = "N/A--N/A",

journal = "Clinical Microbiology and Infection",

issn = "1198-743X",

publisher = "Oxford: Blackwell Science.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Off-site versus on-site clinical microbiology laboratory: a two-year comparison study of blood culture result reporting

AU - Sanguinetti, Maurizio

AU - Posteraro, Brunella

AU - Posteraro, P.

AU - Gasparoli, C.

AU - Errico, F. M.

AU - Massaria, G.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - We analysed the blood culture (BC) result reporting at a small general hospital by a two-year comparison of on-site (year 2018) and off-site (year 2017) microbiology laboratory testing statuses. We observed that the turnaround times decreased and the positivity rates increased for the BCs processed in 2018 compared to those of 2017, and these differences were statistically significant. Our findings suggest that suboptimal preanalytical conditions, including delayed BC processing, may have negatively affected the BC outcomes in 2017.

AB - We analysed the blood culture (BC) result reporting at a small general hospital by a two-year comparison of on-site (year 2018) and off-site (year 2017) microbiology laboratory testing statuses. We observed that the turnaround times decreased and the positivity rates increased for the BCs processed in 2018 compared to those of 2017, and these differences were statistically significant. Our findings suggest that suboptimal preanalytical conditions, including delayed BC processing, may have negatively affected the BC outcomes in 2017.

KW - Blood culture

KW - Diagnostic workflow

KW - Laboratory service

KW - Positive bottles

KW - System process optimization

KW - Blood culture

KW - Diagnostic workflow

KW - Laboratory service

KW - Positive bottles

KW - System process optimization

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/140201

U2 - 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.021

DO - 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.021

M3 - Article

SP - N/A-N/A

JO - Clinical Microbiology and Infection

JF - Clinical Microbiology and Infection

SN - 1198-743X

ER -