@inbook{fa71572e63d1472b94c71636c91ade33,
title = "Nomophylakes e nomophylakia nella Politica di Aristotele",
abstract = "This paper considers three passages of Aristotle{\textquoteright}s Politics which mention nomophylakia and nomophylakes. Although we cannot clear up the historical and institutional context (surely not only Athenian) which inspires Aristotle{\textquoteright}s remarks, the nomophylakia seems to be an “aristocratic” institution, a sort of constitutional corrective which intends, on the one hand, to defend nomos and politeia from abuses by individuals and masses/groups, and, on the other hand, to ensure respect of nomos by magistrates and citizens. Furthermore, Aristotle{\textquoteright}s treatment of nomophylakia and nomophylakes leads to challenge the hypothesis that the Athenian nomophylakes were established by Ephialtes, as Jacoby thought and as it has been recently reproposed by O{\textquoteright}Sullivan.",
keywords = "Aristotele, Aristoteles, Nomophylakes, Politica, Politics, Aristotele, Aristoteles, Nomophylakes, Politica, Politics",
author = "Bearzot, {Cinzia Susanna}",
year = "2012",
language = "Italian",
isbn = "978-88-88617-59-6",
series = "Themata 10",
pages = "29--47",
editor = "Marina Polito and Clara Talamo",
booktitle = "Istituzioni e costituzioni in Aristotele tra storiografia e pensiero politico",
}