Abstract
The Italian law of self-defense(after the 2006 reform of some relevant regulations within the criminal code) is analyzed, especially in its socio-political roots and implications. The new determination of the limits of the right of defense, albeit presented by the lawmakers as an enlargement of "citizens' liberty", reveals a will by government to renounce some of its traditional sovereign prerogatives, resulting in a serious discrimination among people having different abilities to actually defend their rights. Some parallels are drawn between this reform and the evolution in the American legal system and judicature (including the Supreme Court)of the "no duty to retreat" principle as well as of the related right to bear arms. The legal analysis is complemented with a criminological and sociological analysis of new and old expressions of the "ideology of vigilantism", as epitomized by the history of collective violence and lynchings.
| Titolo tradotto del contributo | NO DUTY TO RETREAT? SELF-DEFENSE AND CRIMINAL POLICIES OF 'IDEOLOGICAL RECOGNITION' |
|---|---|
| Lingua originale | Italian |
| Titolo della pubblicazione ospite | Studi in onore di Mario Romano |
| Editore | JOVENE |
| Pagine | 297-366 |
| Numero di pagine | 70 |
| ISBN (stampa) | 978-88-243-2023-8 |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2011 |
OSS delle Nazioni Unite
Questo processo contribuisce al raggiungimento dei seguenti obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile
-
SDG 16 Pace, giustizia e istituzioni solide
Keywords
- Commodus discessus
- Criminal justice
- Criminal law
- Diritto penale
- Legittima difesa
- Linciaggi
- Lynching
- No duty to retreat
- Politica criminale
- Self-defense
- Violence
- Violenza
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'NO DUTY TO RETREAT? LEGITTIMA DIFESA E POLITICHE CRIMINALI DI «RICONOSCIMENTO IDEOLOGICO»'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver