Neuroethical Issues in Cognitive Enhancement: the Undergraduates’ Point of View

Alessandro Antonietti, Alice Cancer, Peter J. Schulz, Silvana Castaldi

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

Abstract

To date, legitimacy of the application of cognitive enhancement programs to healthy individuals is still fueling neuroethics discussions. The aim of the present investigation is analyzing naïve conceptions of the ethical implications of different prac- tices—namely, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), psychotropic drugs, diet, hydration, and physical activity—which can be followed to enhance cognitive performance. An online survey targeted the opinions of the general public about the efficacy of the neuroenhancement techniques and ethical concerns in different contexts. Measures of general self-efficacy and beliefs about intelligence have been collected as well. Responses of 89 Italian undergraduate students of medicine or psychology were analyzed statistically and thematically. Findings supported the notion that passive ways of enhancing human performance, which fail to imply any personal effort and individual responsibility, are conceived as infringing moral rules, regardless of the context where they are implemented.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)323-330
Numero di pagine8
RivistaJOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT
Volume2
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2018

Keywords

  • Cognitive enhancement
  • General self-efficacy
  • Implicit theories of intelligence
  • Neuroethics
  • Neuromodulation
  • Psychotropic drugs
  • tDCS

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Neuroethical Issues in Cognitive Enhancement: the Undergraduates’ Point of View'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo