Abstract
There are numerous conditions and ways through which rigidity can manifest in people’s reasoning. Our review aims to focus on the construct of socio-cognitive polarization, which encompasses both cognitive and social rigidity and its relationship with performance measures of cognitive rigidity as problem-solving. Here we will synthesize a recent wave of research suggesting that susceptibility to extreme political ideology is sculpted by an individual’s cognitively-rooted reasoning architecture that goes above and beyond voting decisions. Foremost we highlight a novel approach to measuring flexibility using content-free problem-solving tasks in contrast to self-report measures and qualitative questionnaires. Further, the results of a series of studies conducted in the last years suggest that the boundaries of rigidity extend well beyond voting decisions to include aspects of rigidity such as conservatism and xenophobia.
| Titolo tradotto del contributo | [Autom. eng. transl.] Navigating the pandemic emergency: The role of socio-cognitive polarization in complex situations |
|---|---|
| Lingua originale | Italian |
| pagine (da-a) | 433-451 |
| Numero di pagine | 19 |
| Rivista | Sistemi Intelligenti |
| Volume | 36 |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2024 |
Keywords
- socio-cognitive polarization
- cognitive flexibility
- political orientation
- xenofobia
- absolutistic thinking
- problem-solving