Natural History and Surgical Outcomes of Lamellar Macular Holes

  • Ismael Chehaibou
  • , Ramin Tadayoni
  • , Jean-Pierre Hubschman
  • , Ferdinando Bottoni
  • , Georges Caputo
  • , Stanley Chang
  • , Roberto Dell'Omo
  • , Marta S Figueroa
  • , Alain Gaudric
  • , Christos Haritoglou
  • , Kazuaki Kadonosono
  • , Christoph Leisser
  • , Mathias Maier
  • , Siegfried Priglinger
  • , Stanislao Rizzo
  • , Ricarda G Schumann
  • , Jerry Sebag
  • , Miroslav Stamenkovic
  • , Marc Veckeneer
  • , David H Steel*
  • *Autore corrispondente per questo lavoro

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the natural history and surgical outcomes of lamellar macular holes (LMHs). Design: Retrospective and consecutive case series. Subjects: Patients with LMHs from multiple tertiary care centers. Methods: Clinical charts and OCT scans were reviewed. Main Outcome Measures: The visual acuity (VA) changes and the occurrence rate of full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) were studied in both groups. Within the operated group, factors associated with 6-month VA and development of FTMH were explored. Results: One hundred seventy-eight eyes were included, of which 89 were monitored and 89 underwent surgery. In the observation group, the mean VA decreased from 0.25 ± 0.18 to 0.28 ± 0.18 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; P = 0.13), with 14 eyes (15.7%) that lost ≥ 0.2 logMAR VA, after 45.7 ± 33.3 months. Nine eyes (10.1%) spontaneously developed an FTMH. In the operated group, the mean VA increased from 0.47 ± 0.23 to 0.35 ± 0.25 logMAR at 6 months (P < 0.001) and 0.36 ± 0.28 logMAR (P = 0.001) after 24.1 ± 30.1 months. By multivariate analysis, better baseline VA (P < 0.001), the presence of an epiretinal membrane (P = 0.03), and the peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM; P = 0.02), with a greater effect of ILM perihole sparing, were associated with a greater 6-month VA. Perihole epiretinal proliferation sparing was associated with a better postoperative VA by univariate analysis (P = 0.03), but this was not significant by multivariate analysis. Eight eyes (9.0%) developed a postoperative FTMH. Using Cox proportional hazard ratios [HRs], pseudophakia at baseline (HR, 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00–0.75; P = 0.03) and peeling of the ILM (HR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01–0.39; P = 0.004) were protective factors, while ellipsoid zone disruption (HR, 10.5; 95% CI, 1.04–105; P = 0.05) was associated with an increased risk of FTMH. Conclusion: Observed eyes with LMH experienced, on average, progressive VA loss. Patients with LMH and altered vision may benefit from surgery. Internal limiting membrane peeling, with perihole ILM sparing, represents a crucial step of the surgery associated with a greater VA and a lower risk of postoperative FTMH. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)210-222
Numero di pagine13
RivistaOphthalmology Retina
Volume8
Numero di pubblicazione3
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oftalmologia

Keywords

  • Lamellar macular hole
  • Natural history
  • OCT
  • Surgery
  • Vitrectomy

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Natural History and Surgical Outcomes of Lamellar Macular Holes'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo