Natural History and Surgical Outcomes of Lamellar Macular Holes

Ismael Chehaibou, Ramin Tadayoni, Jean-Pierre Hubschman, Ferdinando Bottoni, Georges Caputo, Stanley Chang, Roberto Dell'Omo, Marta S. Figueroa, Alain Gaudric, Christos Haritoglou, Kazuaki Kadonosono, Christoph Leisser, Mathias Maier, Siegfried Priglinger, Stanislao Rizzo, Ricarda G. Schumann, Jerry Sebag, Miroslav Stamenkovic, Marc Veckeneer, David H. Steel

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the natural history and surgical outcomes of lamellar macular holes (LMHs). Design: Retrospective and consecutive case series. Subjects: Patients with LMHs from multiple tertiary care centers. Methods: Clinical charts and OCT scans were reviewed. Main Outcome Measures: The visual acuity (VA) changes and the occurrence rate of full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) were studied in both groups. Within the operated group, factors associated with 6-month VA and development of FTMH were explored. Results: One hundred seventy-eight eyes were included, of which 89 were monitored and 89 underwent surgery. In the observation group, the mean VA decreased from 0.25 ± 0.18 to 0.28 ± 0.18 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; P = 0.13), with 14 eyes (15.7%) that lost ≥ 0.2 logMAR VA, after 45.7 ± 33.3 months. Nine eyes (10.1%) spontaneously developed an FTMH. In the operated group, the mean VA increased from 0.47 ± 0.23 to 0.35 ± 0.25 logMAR at 6 months (P < 0.001) and 0.36 ± 0.28 logMAR (P = 0.001) after 24.1 ± 30.1 months. By multivariate analysis, better baseline VA (P < 0.001), the presence of an epiretinal membrane (P = 0.03), and the peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM; P = 0.02), with a greater effect of ILM perihole sparing, were associated with a greater 6-month VA. Perihole epiretinal proliferation sparing was associated with a better postoperative VA by univariate analysis (P = 0.03), but this was not significant by multivariate analysis. Eight eyes (9.0%) developed a postoperative FTMH. Using Cox proportional hazard ratios [HRs], pseudophakia at baseline (HR, 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00–0.75; P = 0.03) and peeling of the ILM (HR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01–0.39; P = 0.004) were protective factors, while ellipsoid zone disruption (HR, 10.5; 95% CI, 1.04–105; P = 0.05) was associated with an increased risk of FTMH. Conclusion: Observed eyes with LMH experienced, on average, progressive VA loss. Patients with LMH and altered vision may benefit from surgery. Internal limiting membrane peeling, with perihole ILM sparing, represents a crucial step of the surgery associated with a greater VA and a lower risk of postoperative FTMH. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)210-222
Numero di pagine13
RivistaOphthalmology Retina
Volume8
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2024

Keywords

  • Lamellar macular hole
  • Natural history
  • Vitrectomy
  • Surgery
  • OCT

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Natural History and Surgical Outcomes of Lamellar Macular Holes'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo