Abstract
The essay, identifying in Wittgenstein, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche three\r\nopposing and symptomatic patterns of setting the relationship between world\r\nand man, traces back, through Husserl’s, Scheler’s and Heidegger’s refl ection,\r\nthe fundamental features of a solution, endorsed by the phenomenological\r\ncurrent, which does not refl ect so much about the ontological reality of the\r\nworld, but puts primarily the question about the way in which man is in world\r\nand world is for man. The typical intentional opening of conscience, in its\r\nvarious modes of orientation, and the vision of the world as the ultimate horizon\r\nof meaning, which allows things to appear, without itself being a thing\r\namong others, establish an essential and constitutive connection, a polarity\r\nof co-membership: man and world reciprocally imply and the project of the\r\nworld causes man’s decision, while signifying the plot of the ontological and\r\ncategorical relationships between things.
Titolo tradotto del contributo | World and man: which relationship? |
---|---|
Lingua originale | Italian |
Titolo della pubblicazione ospite | Esporre ed esporsi al mondo dall'antichità alla contemporaneità. Atti della Summer School EXPOsizioni |
Editore | EDUCatt |
Pagine | 51-74 |
Numero di pagine | 24 |
ISBN (stampa) | 978-88-9335-036-5 |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2016 |
Keywords
- Anthropology
- Antropologia
- Fenomenologia
- Husserl-Scheler-Heidegger
- Man and Human Being
- Mondo-uomo
- Phenomenology