TY - JOUR
T1 - Mollusk allergy in shrimp-allergic patients: Still a complex diagnosis. An Italian real-life cross-sectional multicenter study
AU - Scala, Enrico
AU - Abeni, Damiano
AU - Aruanno, Arianna
AU - Boni, Elisa
AU - Brusca, Ignazio
AU - Cappiello, Francesca
AU - Caprini, Elisabetta
AU - Buzzulini, Francesca
AU - Deleonardi, Gaia
AU - Demonte, Antongiulio
AU - Farioli, Laura
AU - Lodi Rizzini, Fabio
AU - Michelina Losappio, Laura
AU - Macchia, Donatella
AU - Manzotti, Giuseppina
AU - Meneguzzi, Giorgia
AU - Montagni, Marcello
AU - Nucera, Eleonora
AU - Onida, Rosa
AU - Pastorello, Elide Anna
AU - Peveri, Silvia
AU - Radice, Anna
AU - Rivolta, Federica
AU - Rizzi, Angela
AU - Giani, Mauro
AU - Cecchi, Lorenzo
AU - Cecchi, Lorenzo Maria
AU - Pinter, Elena
AU - Miglionico, Marzia
AU - Vantaggio, Lorenzo
AU - Pravettoni, Valerio
AU - Villalta, Danilo
AU - Asero, Riccardo
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Introduction: Shellfish allergy is an important cause of food allergies worldwide. Both in vivo and in vitro diagnostics failure nowadays is caused by the poor quality of the extracts associated with the scarce availability of allergenic molecules in the market. It is known that not all patients with shellfish allergies experience adverse reactions to mollusks. It is still unclear how to detect and diagnose these patients correctly.Aim: To investigate the features of shrimp-allergic patients either reactive or tolerant to mollusks, with the currently available diagnostic methods.Methods: Nineteen centers, scattered throughout Italy, participated in the real-life study, enrolling patients allergic to shrimp with or without associated reactions to mollusks. Patients underwent skin tests using commercial extracts or fresh raw and cooked shrimp and mollusks, and IgE reactivity to currently available allergenic extracts and molecules was measured in vitro.Results: Two hundred and forty-seven individuals with a self reported adverse reactions to shrimp participated in the study; of these 47.8% reported an adverse reaction to mollusks ingestion (cephalopod and/or bivalve). Neither of the tests used, in vivo nor in vitro, was able to detect all selected patients. Accordingly, a great heterogeneity of results was observed: in vivo and in vitro tests agreed in 52% and 62% of cases. Skin tests were able to identify the mollusk reactors (p < 0.001), also using fresh cooked or raw food (p < 0.001). The reactivity profile of mollusk reactors was dominated by Pen m 1, over Pen m 2 and Pen m 4 compared to tolerant subjects, but 33% of patients were not detected by any of the available molecules. Overall, a higher frequency of IgE rectivity to shrimp was recorded in northern Italy, while mollusk reactivity was more frequent in the center-south.Conclusion: The current diagnostic methods are inadequate to predict the cross-reactivity between crustaceans and mollusks. The detection of mollusks hypersensitivity should still rely on skin tests with fresh material. The exclusion of mollusks from shrimp allergic patients' diets should occur when clinical history, available diagnostic instruments, and/or tolerance tests support such a decision.
AB - Introduction: Shellfish allergy is an important cause of food allergies worldwide. Both in vivo and in vitro diagnostics failure nowadays is caused by the poor quality of the extracts associated with the scarce availability of allergenic molecules in the market. It is known that not all patients with shellfish allergies experience adverse reactions to mollusks. It is still unclear how to detect and diagnose these patients correctly.Aim: To investigate the features of shrimp-allergic patients either reactive or tolerant to mollusks, with the currently available diagnostic methods.Methods: Nineteen centers, scattered throughout Italy, participated in the real-life study, enrolling patients allergic to shrimp with or without associated reactions to mollusks. Patients underwent skin tests using commercial extracts or fresh raw and cooked shrimp and mollusks, and IgE reactivity to currently available allergenic extracts and molecules was measured in vitro.Results: Two hundred and forty-seven individuals with a self reported adverse reactions to shrimp participated in the study; of these 47.8% reported an adverse reaction to mollusks ingestion (cephalopod and/or bivalve). Neither of the tests used, in vivo nor in vitro, was able to detect all selected patients. Accordingly, a great heterogeneity of results was observed: in vivo and in vitro tests agreed in 52% and 62% of cases. Skin tests were able to identify the mollusk reactors (p < 0.001), also using fresh cooked or raw food (p < 0.001). The reactivity profile of mollusk reactors was dominated by Pen m 1, over Pen m 2 and Pen m 4 compared to tolerant subjects, but 33% of patients were not detected by any of the available molecules. Overall, a higher frequency of IgE rectivity to shrimp was recorded in northern Italy, while mollusk reactivity was more frequent in the center-south.Conclusion: The current diagnostic methods are inadequate to predict the cross-reactivity between crustaceans and mollusks. The detection of mollusks hypersensitivity should still rely on skin tests with fresh material. The exclusion of mollusks from shrimp allergic patients' diets should occur when clinical history, available diagnostic instruments, and/or tolerance tests support such a decision.
KW - Anaphylaxis
KW - Crustaceans
KW - Food allergy
KW - IgE diagnosis
KW - Mollusks
KW - Multiplex analysis
KW - Tropomyosin
KW - Urticaria/angioedema
KW - Anaphylaxis
KW - Crustaceans
KW - Food allergy
KW - IgE diagnosis
KW - Mollusks
KW - Multiplex analysis
KW - Tropomyosin
KW - Urticaria/angioedema
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/227323
U2 - 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100685
DO - 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100685
M3 - Article
SN - 1939-4551
VL - 15
SP - 100685
EP - 100696
JO - THE WORLD ALLERGY ORGANIZATION JOURNAL
JF - THE WORLD ALLERGY ORGANIZATION JOURNAL
ER -