Metafisica e gnoseologismo: Bontadini interprete di Kant

Massimo Marassi*

*Autore corrispondente per questo lavoro

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolopeer review

Abstract

The article analyses Gustavo Bontadini’s interpretation of modern philosophy, particularly with reference to Immanuel Kant’s critical proposal. Influenced especially by actualism and the Milano School of Amato Masnovo and Francesco Olgiati, Bontadini argues for the priority of metaphysics over gnoseology, pointing out the limitations of modern thought based on representations of reality rather than reality itself directly given to thought. His critique focuses particularly on the aesthetics and analytics of the Critique of Pure Reason, and he believes that Kant represents a breaking point with the classical metaphysical tradition, culminating in a «deflagration» of gnoseologism. Bontadini sees Kant as the culminating point of a deviation from metaphysical realism that runs throughout modernity, although he recognizes the historical importance and transformative potential of Kantian philosophy. Bontadini’s perspective contrasts with that of other philosophers, contemporary with Kant, who appreciate his innovation and influence on modern thought, and it differs from the positive historical assessment that has also been given in subsequent centuries.
Titolo tradotto del contributo[Autom. eng. transl.] Metaphysics and epistemology: Bontadini interprets Kant
Lingua originaleItalian
pagine (da-a)759-800
Numero di pagine42
RivistaRivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica
VolumeCXV
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2024

Keywords

  • Gustavo Bontadini, Immanuel Kant, Unity of Experience, A Priori Synthesis, Transcendental Object
  • Gustavo Bontadini, Immanuel Kant, unità dell'esperienza, sintesi a priori, oggetto trascendentale

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Metafisica e gnoseologismo: Bontadini interprete di Kant'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo