TY - JOUR
T1 - Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer in people with workplace exposure to asbestos
AU - Maisonneuve, Patrick
AU - Rampinelli, Cristiano
AU - Bertolotti, Raffaella
AU - Misotti, Alessandro
AU - Lococo, Filippo
AU - Casiraghi, Monica
AU - Spaggiari, Lorenzo
AU - Bellomi, Massimo
AU - Novellis, Pierluigi
AU - Solinas, Michela
AU - Dieci, Elisa
AU - Alloisio, Marco
AU - Fontana, Luca
AU - Persechino, Benedetta
AU - Iavicoli, Sergio
AU - Veronesi, Giulia
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Objectives: Smoking is the main risk factor for lung cancer, but environmental and occupational exposure to carcinogens also increase lung cancer risk. We assessed whether extending low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening to persons with occupational exposure to asbestos may be an effective way reducing lung cancer mortality. Materials and methods: We conducted a nested case-control study within the COSMOS screening program, assessing past asbestos exposure with a questionnaire. LDCT scans of asbestos-exposed participants were reviewed to assess the presence of pulmonary, interstitial and pleural alterations in comparison to matched unexposed controls. We also performed an exhaustive review, with meta-analysis, of the literature on LDCT screening in asbestos-exposed persons. Results: Exposure to asbestos, initially self-reported by 9.8% of COSMOS participants, was confirmed in 216 of 544 assessable cases, corresponding to 2.6% of the screened population. LDCT of asbestos-exposed persons had significantly more pleural plaques, diaphragmatic pleural thickening and pleural calcifications, but similar frequency of parenchymal and interstitial alterations to unexposed persons. From 16 papers, including this study, overall lung cancer detection rates at baseline were 0.81% (95% CI 0.50–1.19) in asbestos-exposed persons, 0.94% (95% CI 0.47–1.53) in asbestos-exposed smokers (12 studies), and 0.11% (95% CI 0.00-0.43) in asbestos-exposed non-smokers (9 studies). Conclusion: Persons occupationally exposed to asbestos should be monitored to gather more information about risks. Although LDCT screening is effective in the early detection lung cancer in asbestos-exposed smokers, our data suggest that screening of asbestos-exposed persons with no additional risk factors for cancer does is not viable due to the low detection rate.
AB - Objectives: Smoking is the main risk factor for lung cancer, but environmental and occupational exposure to carcinogens also increase lung cancer risk. We assessed whether extending low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening to persons with occupational exposure to asbestos may be an effective way reducing lung cancer mortality. Materials and methods: We conducted a nested case-control study within the COSMOS screening program, assessing past asbestos exposure with a questionnaire. LDCT scans of asbestos-exposed participants were reviewed to assess the presence of pulmonary, interstitial and pleural alterations in comparison to matched unexposed controls. We also performed an exhaustive review, with meta-analysis, of the literature on LDCT screening in asbestos-exposed persons. Results: Exposure to asbestos, initially self-reported by 9.8% of COSMOS participants, was confirmed in 216 of 544 assessable cases, corresponding to 2.6% of the screened population. LDCT of asbestos-exposed persons had significantly more pleural plaques, diaphragmatic pleural thickening and pleural calcifications, but similar frequency of parenchymal and interstitial alterations to unexposed persons. From 16 papers, including this study, overall lung cancer detection rates at baseline were 0.81% (95% CI 0.50–1.19) in asbestos-exposed persons, 0.94% (95% CI 0.47–1.53) in asbestos-exposed smokers (12 studies), and 0.11% (95% CI 0.00-0.43) in asbestos-exposed non-smokers (9 studies). Conclusion: Persons occupationally exposed to asbestos should be monitored to gather more information about risks. Although LDCT screening is effective in the early detection lung cancer in asbestos-exposed smokers, our data suggest that screening of asbestos-exposed persons with no additional risk factors for cancer does is not viable due to the low detection rate.
KW - Asbestos-exposed
KW - Low-dose chest CT
KW - Lung cancer screening
KW - Lung-neoplasms
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Pleural plaques
KW - Pleural thickening
KW - Asbestos-exposed
KW - Low-dose chest CT
KW - Lung cancer screening
KW - Lung-neoplasms
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Pleural plaques
KW - Pleural thickening
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/151962
U2 - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.03.003
DO - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.03.003
M3 - Article
SN - 0169-5002
VL - 131
SP - 23
EP - 30
JO - Lung Cancer
JF - Lung Cancer
ER -