Abstract
We analyze the results from three different risk attitude elicitation methods. First, the broadly used test by Holt and Laury (2002), HL, second, the lottery-panel task by Sabater-Grande and Georgantzis (2002), SG, and third, responses to a survey question on self-assessment of general attitude towards risk (Dohmen et al. 2011). The first and the second task are implemented with real monetary incentives, while the third concerns all domains in life in general. Like in previous studies, the correlation of decisions across tasks is low and usually statistically non-significant. However, when we consider only subjects whose behavior across the panels of the SG task is compatible with constant relative risk aversion (CRRA), the correlation between HL and self-assessed risk attitude becomes significant. Furthermore, the correlation between HL and SG also increases for CRRA-compatible subjects, although it remains statistically non-significant.
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 341-372 |
| Numero di pagine | 32 |
| Rivista | Theory and Decision |
| Volume | 84 |
| Numero di pubblicazione | 3 |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2018 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Scienze delle Decisioni Generali
- Psicologia dello Sviluppo e dell’Educazione
- Discipline Umanistiche (varie)
- Psicologia Applicata
- Scienze Sociali Generali
- Economia, Econometria e Finanza Generali
- Informatica Applicata
Keywords
- Elicitation methods
- Lottery choices
- Risk aversion