TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-Term Safety of Level II Oncoplastic Surgery after Neoadjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: A 20-Year Experience
AU - Sanchez, Alejandro Martin
AU - De Lauretis, Flavia
AU - Bucaro, Angela
AU - Borghesan, Niccolo'
AU - Pirrottina, Chiara Valeria
AU - Franco, Antonio
AU - Scardina, Lorenzo
AU - Giannarelli, Diana
AU - Millochau, Jenny C.
AU - Parapini, Marina L.
AU - Di Leone, Alba
AU - Marazzi, Fabio
AU - Orlandi, Armando
AU - Palazzo, Antonella
AU - Fabi, Alessandra
AU - Masetti, Riccardo
AU - Franceschini, Gianluca
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: Oncoplastic surgery (OPS) reliability in the post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) setting is still debated due to weak scientific evidences in such scenarios. Methods: Our analysis aims to report results obtained in a retrospective series of 111 patients consecutively treated with level II OPS after NACT at the Multidisciplinary Breast Center of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS between 1998 and 2018. The surgical endpoints were the mean specimen volume, rates of positive margins (PMR), re-excision (RR), conversion to mastectomy (CMR), and complications (CR). The oncological endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence (LR). To evaluate the impact of NACT on surgical and oncological outcomes at 302 months, we conducted a propensity score matching, pairing patients in post-NACT and upfront surgery groups. Results: The mean sample volume was 390,796 mm3. We registered a 3.6% of PMR, 1.8% RR, 0.9% CMR, 5% CR. The 10-year OS and 10-year DFS with a median follow-up of 88 months (6–302) were 79% and 76%, respectively, with an LR recurrence rate of 5%. The post-NACT group received significantly larger excised volumes and lower PMR. NACT did not affect surgical and oncological outcomes. Conclusions: Level II OPS can be considered a reliable alternative to mastectomy even in the post-NACT setting.
AB - Background: Oncoplastic surgery (OPS) reliability in the post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) setting is still debated due to weak scientific evidences in such scenarios. Methods: Our analysis aims to report results obtained in a retrospective series of 111 patients consecutively treated with level II OPS after NACT at the Multidisciplinary Breast Center of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS between 1998 and 2018. The surgical endpoints were the mean specimen volume, rates of positive margins (PMR), re-excision (RR), conversion to mastectomy (CMR), and complications (CR). The oncological endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence (LR). To evaluate the impact of NACT on surgical and oncological outcomes at 302 months, we conducted a propensity score matching, pairing patients in post-NACT and upfront surgery groups. Results: The mean sample volume was 390,796 mm3. We registered a 3.6% of PMR, 1.8% RR, 0.9% CMR, 5% CR. The 10-year OS and 10-year DFS with a median follow-up of 88 months (6–302) were 79% and 76%, respectively, with an LR recurrence rate of 5%. The post-NACT group received significantly larger excised volumes and lower PMR. NACT did not affect surgical and oncological outcomes. Conclusions: Level II OPS can be considered a reliable alternative to mastectomy even in the post-NACT setting.
KW - breast cancer
KW - breast cancer minimally invasive treatment
KW - oncoplastic surgery
KW - minimally invasive treatment
KW - neoadjuvant chemotherapy
KW - locally advanced breast cancer
KW - breast cancer
KW - breast cancer minimally invasive treatment
KW - oncoplastic surgery
KW - minimally invasive treatment
KW - neoadjuvant chemotherapy
KW - locally advanced breast cancer
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/312246
U2 - 10.3390/jcm13133665
DO - 10.3390/jcm13133665
M3 - Article
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 13
SP - N/A-N/A
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
ER -