Salta alla navigazione principale Salta alla ricerca Salta al contenuto principale

Liver-First Approach for Synchronous Colorectal Metastases: Analysis of 7360 Patients from the LiverMetSurvey Registry

  • Felice Giuliante*
  • , L. Vigano
  • , Rose A. M. De
  • , D. F. Mirza
  • , R. Lapointe
  • , G. Kaiser
  • , E. Barroso
  • , A. Ferrero
  • , H. Isoniemi
  • , S. Lopez-Ben
  • , I. Popescu
  • , Ouellet J. -F.
  • , C. Hubert
  • , Regimbeau J. -M.
  • , Lin J. -K.
  • , O. G. Skipenko
  • , Francesco Ardito
  • , R. Adam
  • *Autore corrispondente per questo lavoro
  • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
  • University of Duisburg-Essen
  • Hospital Curry Cabral
  • Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I
  • University of Helsinki
  • ICO Girona Hospital Josep Trueta
  • Fundeni Clinical Institute
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • Hôpital Paul Brousse

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolopeer review

Abstract

Background: The liver-first approach in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has gained wide consensus but its role is still to be clarified. We aimed to elucidate the outcome of the liver-first approach and to identify patients who benefit at most from this approach. Methods: Patients with synchronous CRLM included in the LiverMetSurvey registry between 2000 and 2017 were considered. Three strategies were analyzed, i.e. liver-first approach, colorectal resection followed by liver resection (primary-first), and simultaneous resection, and three groups of patients were analyzed, i.e. solitary metastasis, multiple unilobar CRLM, and multiple bilobar CRLM. In each group, patients from the three strategy groups were matched by propensity score analysis. Results: Overall, 7360 patients were analyzed: 4415 primary-first, 552 liver-first, and 2393 simultaneous resections. Compared with the other groups, the liver-first group had more rectal tumors (58.0% vs. 31.2%) and higher hepatic tumor burden (more than three CRLMs: 34.8% vs. 24.0%; size > 50 mm: 35.6% vs. 22.8%; p < 0.001). In patients with solitary and multiple unilobar CRLM, survival was similar regardless of treatment strategy, whereas in patients with multiple bilobar metastases, the liver-first approach was an independent positive prognostic factor, both in unmatched patients (3-year survival 65.9% vs. primary-first 60.4%: hazard ratio [HR] 1.321, p = 0.031; vs. simultaneous resections 54.4%: HR 1.624, p < 0.001) and after propensity score matching (vs. primary-first: HR 1.667, p = 0.017; vs. simultaneous resections: HR 2.278, p = 0.003). Conclusion: In patients with synchronous CRLM, the surgical strategy should be decided according to the hepatic tumor burden. In the presence of multiple bilobar CRLM, the liver-first approach is associated with longer survival than the alternative approaches and should be evaluated as standard.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)8198-8208
Numero di pagine11
RivistaAnnals of Surgical Oncology
Volume28
Numero di pubblicazione13
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Chirurgia
  • Oncologia

Keywords

  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Hepatectomy
  • Humans
  • Liver
  • Liver Neoplasms
  • Retrospective Studies
  • colorectal liver metastases
  • liver resection

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Liver-First Approach for Synchronous Colorectal Metastases: Analysis of 7360 Patients from the LiverMetSurvey Registry'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo