TY - JOUR
T1 - Life cycle environmental benefits of a forward-thinking design phase for buildings: the case study of a temporary pavilion built for an international exhibition
AU - Arrigoni, Alessandro
AU - Zucchinelli, Maria
AU - Collatina, Davide
AU - Dotelli, Giovanni
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - The life cycle of a pavilion built for an international exhibition was investigated to understand the role that the design phase may play in the environmental sustainability of buildings. The limited life span of the structure allowed for a complete life cycle assessment (LCA) based on primary data to be undertaken, including the end of the first life. A methodology that considered an extension of the service life was applied to estimate the environmental impacts of distinct end-of-life scenarios. Results confirmed the paramount importance of the design phase in improving the life cycle sustainability of buildings. Accurate selection of materials allowed to markedly reduce the impact of the product stage (e.g. 37% fewer greenhouse gas emissions). Design for disassembly proved to be a necessary but not a sufficient condition to minimise the end-of-life impacts: design phase should not be limited to the appropriate selection of materials and components’ connections but must also foresee a second use for the structure or the materials at the end of the first life. Forecasting an after-life for the structure could reduce the life cycle burden up to 40% for several environmental impact categories. Conversely, if the second use is not predefined, the economic cost in the dismantling operation could become the priority rather than the salvaging of the components. Results of the present study may be used by future (temporary) building designers to improve the sustainability of their structure and to avoid the errors identified in the present case.
AB - The life cycle of a pavilion built for an international exhibition was investigated to understand the role that the design phase may play in the environmental sustainability of buildings. The limited life span of the structure allowed for a complete life cycle assessment (LCA) based on primary data to be undertaken, including the end of the first life. A methodology that considered an extension of the service life was applied to estimate the environmental impacts of distinct end-of-life scenarios. Results confirmed the paramount importance of the design phase in improving the life cycle sustainability of buildings. Accurate selection of materials allowed to markedly reduce the impact of the product stage (e.g. 37% fewer greenhouse gas emissions). Design for disassembly proved to be a necessary but not a sufficient condition to minimise the end-of-life impacts: design phase should not be limited to the appropriate selection of materials and components’ connections but must also foresee a second use for the structure or the materials at the end of the first life. Forecasting an after-life for the structure could reduce the life cycle burden up to 40% for several environmental impact categories. Conversely, if the second use is not predefined, the economic cost in the dismantling operation could become the priority rather than the salvaging of the components. Results of the present study may be used by future (temporary) building designers to improve the sustainability of their structure and to avoid the errors identified in the present case.
KW - 2300
KW - Design for disassembly
KW - End of life
KW - Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
KW - Reuse
KW - Service life
KW - Strategy and Management1409 Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
KW - Temporary building
KW - 2300
KW - Design for disassembly
KW - End of life
KW - Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
KW - Reuse
KW - Service life
KW - Strategy and Management1409 Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
KW - Temporary building
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/121995
UR - https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-cleaner-production
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.230
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.230
M3 - Article
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 187
SP - 974
EP - 983
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
ER -