TY - JOUR
T1 - Leaving child and adolescent mental health services in the MILESTONE cohort: a longitudinal cohort study on young people's mental health indicators, care pathways, and outcomes in Europe
AU - Gerritsen, Suzanne E.
AU - Van Bodegom, Larissa S.
AU - Overbeek, Mathilde M.
AU - Maras, Athanasios
AU - Verhulst, Frank C.
AU - Wolke, Dieter
AU - Rizopoulos, Dimitris
AU - De Girolamo, Giovanni
AU - Franic, Tomislav
AU - Madan, Jason
AU - Mcnicholas, Fiona
AU - Paul, Moli
AU - Purper-Ouakil, Diane
AU - Santosh, Paramala J.
AU - Schulze, Ulrike M. E.
AU - Singh, Swaran P.
AU - Street, Cathy
AU - Tremmery, Sabine
AU - Tuomainen, Helena
AU - Dieleman, Gwendolyn C.
AU - Appleton, Rebecca
AU - Davidovic, Nikolina Vrljicak
AU - Ferrari, Sabrina
AU - Fiori, Federico
AU - Gatherer, Charlotte
AU - Hendrickx, Gaelle
AU - Holme, Ingrid
AU - Jardri, Renaud
AU - Kolozsvari, Alfred
AU - Lievesley, Kate
AU - Mastroianni, Mathilde
AU - Maurice, Virginie
AU - Morini, Giorgia
AU - Parenti, Aesa
AU - Russet, Frederick
AU - Saam, Melanie
AU - Sagar-Ouriaghli, Ilyas
AU - Sartor, Anne
AU - Signorini, Giulia
AU - Singh, Jatinder
AU - Tah, Priya
AU - Jerkovic, Helena
AU - Tuffrey, Amanda
AU - Van Amelsvoort, Therese A.M.J.
AU - Varvara, Pamela
AU - Vicari, Stefano
AU - Walker, Leanne
AU - Wilson, Anna
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background The configuration of having separate mental health services by age, namely child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) and adult mental health services (AMHS), might be a barrier to continuity of care that adversely affects young people's mental health. However, no studies have investigated whether discontinuity of care in the transition period affects mental health. We aimed to discern the type of care young people receive after reaching the upper age limit of their CAMHS and examine differences in outcomes at 24-month follow-up between young people receiving different types of care.Methods To assess mental health in young people from 39 CAMHS in eight European countries (Belgium, Croatia, France, Germany, Italy, Ireland, the Netherlands, and the UK), we did a longitudinal cohort study. Eligible young people were CAMHS users up to 1 year younger than the upper age limit of their CAMHS or up to 3 months older, if they were still in CAMHS. Information on mental health service use, mental health problems (ie, using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents, Youth Self-Report and Adult Self-Report, DSM-5, and ICD-10), and sociodemographic characteristics were collected using self-reported, parent-reported, and clinician -reported interviews and questionnaires. Mixed models were applied to assess relationships between baseline characteristics, mental health service use, and outcomes.Findings The MILESTONE cohort included 763 young people. The participants were 60middot0% female (n=458) and 40middot0% male (n=305), 90middot3% White (n=578), and had a mean age of 17middot5 years (range 15middot2-19middot6 years). Over the 24-month follow-up period, 48 young people (6middot3%) actively withdrew from the study. For young people, the higher their scores on the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents (p=0middot0009) and Youth Self -Report and Adult Self-Report (p=0middot046), and who had a clinical classification of severe mental illness (p=0middot0033), had suicidal thoughts or behaviours or self-harm (p=0middot034), used psychotropic medication (p=0middot0014), and had a self -reported or parent-reported need for continued treatment (p < 0middot0001) at baseline, were more likely to transition to AMHS or stay in CAMHS than to have care end. Overall, over the 24-month follow-up period, the mental health of young people improved, but 24middot4% of young people reported an increase in problems calculated using the reliable change index, of whom 5middot3% had a clinically relevant increase in problems. At 24-month follow-up, no differences in change in mental health problems since baseline were found between young people who used different types of care (CAMHS, AMHS, or no care).Interpretation Although approximately half of young people reaching the upper age limit of their CAMHS stop using mental health services, this was not associated with a deterioration in their mental health. Young people with the most severe mental health problems are more likely to receive continued care. If replicated, our findings suggest investments in improving transitional care for all CAMHS users might not be cost-effective in times of rising health-care costs, but might be better targeted at a subgroup of young people with increasing mental health problems who do not receive continued treatment.Funding European Commission's 7th Framework Programme.
AB - Background The configuration of having separate mental health services by age, namely child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) and adult mental health services (AMHS), might be a barrier to continuity of care that adversely affects young people's mental health. However, no studies have investigated whether discontinuity of care in the transition period affects mental health. We aimed to discern the type of care young people receive after reaching the upper age limit of their CAMHS and examine differences in outcomes at 24-month follow-up between young people receiving different types of care.Methods To assess mental health in young people from 39 CAMHS in eight European countries (Belgium, Croatia, France, Germany, Italy, Ireland, the Netherlands, and the UK), we did a longitudinal cohort study. Eligible young people were CAMHS users up to 1 year younger than the upper age limit of their CAMHS or up to 3 months older, if they were still in CAMHS. Information on mental health service use, mental health problems (ie, using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents, Youth Self-Report and Adult Self-Report, DSM-5, and ICD-10), and sociodemographic characteristics were collected using self-reported, parent-reported, and clinician -reported interviews and questionnaires. Mixed models were applied to assess relationships between baseline characteristics, mental health service use, and outcomes.Findings The MILESTONE cohort included 763 young people. The participants were 60middot0% female (n=458) and 40middot0% male (n=305), 90middot3% White (n=578), and had a mean age of 17middot5 years (range 15middot2-19middot6 years). Over the 24-month follow-up period, 48 young people (6middot3%) actively withdrew from the study. For young people, the higher their scores on the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents (p=0middot0009) and Youth Self -Report and Adult Self-Report (p=0middot046), and who had a clinical classification of severe mental illness (p=0middot0033), had suicidal thoughts or behaviours or self-harm (p=0middot034), used psychotropic medication (p=0middot0014), and had a self -reported or parent-reported need for continued treatment (p < 0middot0001) at baseline, were more likely to transition to AMHS or stay in CAMHS than to have care end. Overall, over the 24-month follow-up period, the mental health of young people improved, but 24middot4% of young people reported an increase in problems calculated using the reliable change index, of whom 5middot3% had a clinically relevant increase in problems. At 24-month follow-up, no differences in change in mental health problems since baseline were found between young people who used different types of care (CAMHS, AMHS, or no care).Interpretation Although approximately half of young people reaching the upper age limit of their CAMHS stop using mental health services, this was not associated with a deterioration in their mental health. Young people with the most severe mental health problems are more likely to receive continued care. If replicated, our findings suggest investments in improving transitional care for all CAMHS users might not be cost-effective in times of rising health-care costs, but might be better targeted at a subgroup of young people with increasing mental health problems who do not receive continued treatment.Funding European Commission's 7th Framework Programme.
KW - n/a
KW - n/a
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/304691
U2 - 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00310-8
DO - 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00310-8
M3 - Article
SN - 2215-0366
VL - 9
SP - 944
EP - 956
JO - The Lancet Psychiatry
JF - The Lancet Psychiatry
ER -