Abstract
skills may be learned by active experience (experiential learning or learning by
doing) or by observation of others’ experience (learning by observation). In general,
learning by observation reduces the time and the attempts needed to learn complex
actions and behaviors. The present research aimed to compare learning by observation
and learning by doing in two clinical populations with different etiology of intellectual
disability (ID), as individuals with Down syndrome (DS) and individuals with
Williams syndrome (WS), with the hypothesis that specific profiles of learning may be
found in each syndrome. To this end, we used a mixture of new and existing data to
compare the performances of 24 individuals with DS, 24 individuals with WS and 24
typically developing children on computerized tasks of learning by observation or
learning by doing. The main result was that the two groups with ID exhibited distinct
patterns of learning by observation. Thus, individuals with DS were impaired in reproducing
the previously observed visuo-motor
sequence, while they were as efficient as
TD children in the experiential learning task. On the other hand, individuals with WS
benefited from the observational training while they were severely impaired in detecting
the visuo-motor
sequence in the experiential learning task (when presented first).
The present findings reinforce the syndrome-specific
hypothesis and the view of ID as
a variety of conditions in which some cognitive functions are more disrupted than others
because of the differences in genetic profile and brain morphology and functionality.
These findings have important implications for clinicians, who should take into
account the genetic etiology of ID in developing learning programs for treatment and
education.
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
pagine (da-a) | N/A-N/A |
Rivista | Developmental Science |
DOI | |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2018 |
Keywords
- Child
- Down syndrome
- williams syndrome