The work stems from the decision taken by the Regional Administrative Court of Lombardy, Milan, Chambers II, no. 451 of 14.02.2013 to investigate the nature and purposes of the institute of the monetisation of town planning standards and the legal protection regime of the position of the private individual (legitimate interest or subjective right; applicability of the time limit or limitation period). Although the sentence does not enter into the merits of the events, it does provide an opportunity to analyse the problem of the admissibility of the monetisation of standards under the scope of transposition planning, or rather also during the issue of the individual construction business qualifications.
|Titolo tradotto del contributo||[Autom. eng. transl.] Judicial actions against the substitute monetization of the transfer of urban planning standards: decadent or prescription term?|
|Stato di pubblicazione||Pubblicato - 2014|
- standard urbanistici