TY - JOUR
T1 - Lay and professional stakeholder involvement in scoping palliative care issues: Methods used in seven European countries
AU - Brereton, Louise
AU - Ingleton, Christine
AU - Gardiner, Clare
AU - Goyder, Elizabeth
AU - Mozygemba, Kati
AU - Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke
AU - Tummers, Marcia
AU - Sacchini, Dario
AU - Leppert, Wojciech
AU - Blaẑeviĉienė, Aurelija
AU - Van Der Wilt, Gert Jan
AU - Refolo, Pietro
AU - De Nicola, Martina
AU - Chilcott, James
AU - Oortwijn, Wija
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Background: Stakeholders are people with an interest in a topic. Internationally, stakeholder involvement in palliative care research
and health technology assessment requires development. Stakeholder involvement adds value throughout research (from prioritising
topics to disseminating findings). Philosophies and understandings about the best ways to involve stakeholders in research differ
internationally. Stakeholder involvement took place in seven countries (England, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway
and Poland). Findings informed a project that developed concepts and methods for health technology assessment and applied these to
evaluate models of palliative care service delivery.
Aims: To report on stakeholder involvement in the INTEGRATE-HTA project and how issues identified informed project
development.
Design: Using stakeholder consultation or a qualitative research design, as appropriate locally, stakeholders in seven countries acted
as ‘advisors’ to aid researchers’ decision making. Thematic analysis was used to identify key issues across countries.
Setting/participants: A total of 132 stakeholders (82 professionals and 50 ‘lay’ people) aged ⩾18 participated in individual face-toface
or telephone interviews, consultation meetings or focus groups.
Results: Different stakeholder involvement methods were used successfully to identify key issues in palliative care. A total of 23
issues common to three or more countries informed decisions about the intervention and comparator of interest, sub questions and
specific assessments within the health technology assessment.
Conclusion: Stakeholders, including patients and families undergoing palliative care, can inform project decision making using
various involvement methods according to the local context. Researchers should consider local understandings about stakeholder
involvement as views of appropriate and feasible methods vary. Methods for stakeholder involvement, especially consultation, need
further development.
AB - Background: Stakeholders are people with an interest in a topic. Internationally, stakeholder involvement in palliative care research
and health technology assessment requires development. Stakeholder involvement adds value throughout research (from prioritising
topics to disseminating findings). Philosophies and understandings about the best ways to involve stakeholders in research differ
internationally. Stakeholder involvement took place in seven countries (England, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway
and Poland). Findings informed a project that developed concepts and methods for health technology assessment and applied these to
evaluate models of palliative care service delivery.
Aims: To report on stakeholder involvement in the INTEGRATE-HTA project and how issues identified informed project
development.
Design: Using stakeholder consultation or a qualitative research design, as appropriate locally, stakeholders in seven countries acted
as ‘advisors’ to aid researchers’ decision making. Thematic analysis was used to identify key issues across countries.
Setting/participants: A total of 132 stakeholders (82 professionals and 50 ‘lay’ people) aged ⩾18 participated in individual face-toface
or telephone interviews, consultation meetings or focus groups.
Results: Different stakeholder involvement methods were used successfully to identify key issues in palliative care. A total of 23
issues common to three or more countries informed decisions about the intervention and comparator of interest, sub questions and
specific assessments within the health technology assessment.
Conclusion: Stakeholders, including patients and families undergoing palliative care, can inform project decision making using
various involvement methods according to the local context. Researchers should consider local understandings about stakeholder
involvement as views of appropriate and feasible methods vary. Methods for stakeholder involvement, especially consultation, need
further development.
KW - Patient involvement
KW - Patient involvement
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/81114
U2 - 10.1177/0269216316649154
DO - 10.1177/0269216316649154
M3 - Article
SN - 0269-2163
VL - 31
SP - 181
EP - 192
JO - Palliative Medicine
JF - Palliative Medicine
ER -