L'aporia tra ius dicere e ius facere

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review


This writing deals with the question whether in a civil law jurisdiction, as Italy is, the Courts are empowered of making law as a source comparable to statutes. The answer cannot be definite in terms of yes or no, but must be articulated according to the experience. In any case Courts can be recognized as secondary sources of law, subject as they are to legislation. There are examples of exceeding the limits, but these are not to be taken as truly conform to the actual legal order. In a civil law country Courts also cannot be considered as source of customary law, since decisions are not binding even when they acquire in fact the status of precedents. Nor are the Courts entitled to directly do justice. Yet a true idea of what is going on implies the recognition of what the Courts really do.
Titolo tradotto del contributo[Autom. eng. transl.] L'perplexity of the right to speak out against the law to do
Lingua originaleItalian
pagine (da-a)981-1017
Numero di pagine37
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2016


  • courts' decisionmaking
  • fonti del diritto
  • giurisprudenza
  • sources of law


Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'L'aporia tra ius dicere e ius facere'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo