Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: updated guidelines from the EAES and EHS endorsed Consensus Development Conference

Armando Antinori, Gianfranco Silecchia, Fabio Cesare Campanile, Luis Sanchez, Graziano Ceccarelli, Luca Ansaloni, Stefano Olmi, Giovanni Carlo Ferrari, Diego Cuccurullo, Paolo Baccari, Ferdinando Agresta, Nereo Vettoretto, Micaela Piccoli

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

61 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The Executive board of the Italian Society for Endoscopic Surgery (SICE) promoted an update of the first evidence-based Italian Consensus Conference Guidelines 2010 because a large amount of literature has been published in the last 4 years about the topics examined and new relevant issues. Methods The scientific committee selected the topics to be addressed: indications to surgical treatment including special conditions (obesity, cirrhosis, diastasis recti abdominis, acute presentation); safety and outcome of intraperitoneal meshes (synthetic and biologic); fixing devices (absorbable/non-absorbable); abdominal border and parastomal hernia; intraoperative and perioperative complications; and recurrent ventral/incisional hernia. All the recommendations are the result of a careful and complete literature review examined with autonomous judgment by the entire panel. The process was supervised by experts in methodology and epidemiology from the most qualified Italian institution. Two external reviewers were designed by the EAES and EHS to guarantee the most objective, transparent, and reliable work. The Oxford hierarchy (OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group*. “The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence”) was used by the panel to grade clinical outcomes according to levels of evidence. The recommendations were based on the grading system suggested by the GRADE working group. Results and Conclusions The availability of recent level 1 evidence (a meta-analysis of 10 RCTs) allowed to recommend that not only laparoscopic repair is an acceptable alternative to the open repair, but also it is advantageous in terms of shorter hospital stay and wound infection rate. This conclusion appears to be extremely relevant in a clinical setting. Indications about specific conditions could also be issued: laparoscopy is recommended for the treatment of recurrent ventral hernias and obese patients, while it is a potential option for compensated cirrhotic and childbearing-age female patients. Many relevant and controversial topics were thoroughly examined by this consensus conference for the first time. Among them are the issue of safety of the intraperitoneal mesh placement, traditionally considered a major drawback of the laparoscopic technique, the role for the biologic meshes, and various aspects of the laparoscopic approach for particular locations of the defect such as the abdominal border or parastomal hernias.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)2463-2484
Numero di pagine22
RivistaSurgical Endoscopy
Volume29
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2015

Keywords

  • ABDOMINAL-WALL HERNIAS
  • EXPANDED POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE MESH
  • MODIFIED SUGARBAKER TECHNIQUE
  • MORBIDLY OBESE-PATIENTS
  • QUALITY-OF-LIFE
  • RANDOMIZED-CLINICAL-TRIAL
  • SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE
  • SUBXIPHOID INCISIONAL HERNIAS
  • TERM-FOLLOW-UP
  • VENTRAL HERNIA

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: updated guidelines from the EAES and EHS endorsed Consensus Development Conference'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo