La metafisica come filosofia delle differenze antropologiche

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the relevance of Bontadini’s analysis of «Contemporaryism». Bontadini introduced this historical-philosophical category to denote that contemporary philosophy is primarily characterized by a strong anti-metaphysical perspective on knowledge and experience. In order to evaluate the inconsistency of this «Anti-Metaphysicism» – exemplified by Neopositivism – the paper will first emphasize the role of Bontadini’s «Neoclassical Philosophy» in the broader context of Western philosophy’s development. Consequently, the historical and theoretical significance of Neoclassical Philosophy will be highlighted through its metaphysics, understood as a rational discussion of «anthropological differences». In this regard, the paper will ultimately underscore the originality of Bontadini’s non-dogmatic conception of metaphysics, which is based on acknowledging the richness of experience and the capacity for reason to be open-ended.
Titolo tradotto del contributo[Autom. eng. transl.] Metaphysics as a philosophy of anthropological differences
Lingua originaleItalian
pagine (da-a)729-741
Numero di pagine13
RivistaRivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica
VolumeCVX
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2023

Keywords

  • Gustavo Bontadini, Classical Metaphysics, Contemporary Philosophy, Neopositivism, Transcendental Anthropology
  • Gustavo Bontadini, Metafisica classica, Filosofia contemporanea, Neopositivismo, Antropologia trascendentale

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'La metafisica come filosofia delle differenze antropologiche'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo