Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to bring into focus the provision laid
down by art. 273 TFEU, which entitles Member states to resort to the
European Court of Justice in order to settle international public law
disputes arising amongst themselves. In this case, the ECJ acts as a
court of arbitration, with its jurisdiction predicated on a « special
agreement ». This provision was originally introduced in the Treaty
of Rome (1957), but Member states have rarely relied upon it over
the years. With this in mind, the use of special agreements in the
Treaties establishing the EFSF and the ESM as well as in the Fiscal
Compact is striking and deserves an in-depth analysis. In particular,
close attention is paid to the Fiscal Compact, whereby the signatories
set up a rather complex mechanism in order to commence legal
proceedings before the ECJ. The paper is divided in two parts. The
first part touches upon the rationale and the scope of art. 273 TFEU.
The second part assesses the consistency of the judicial enforcement
mechanism envisaged in the Fiscal Compact with EU law by also
taking into consideration the ECJ’s case-law, with particular attention
given to the Pringle judgment.
Titolo tradotto del contributo | [Autom. eng. transl.] Arbitration jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the EU and the Fiscal Compact |
---|---|
Lingua originale | Italian |
pagine (da-a) | 199-224 |
Numero di pagine | 26 |
Rivista | RIVISTA ITALIANA DI DIRITTO PUBBLICO COMUNITARIO |
Volume | XXIII |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2013 |
Pubblicato esternamente | Sì |
Keywords
- Art. 273 TFEU
- Compromise
- Court of Justice
- Fiscal Compact